Who Gets Long COVID and Suffers its Mental Health and Socioeconomic Consequences in the United States? Preliminary Findings from a Large Nationwide Study
Kim, D.
Show abstract
As the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases now exceeds 100 million cases in the United States and continues to climb, concerns have been increasingly raised over the future public health and economic burden of long COVID including disability and concomitant declines in labor force participation. Only a handful of US population-based studies have explored sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics that put people at risk of long COVID or have investigated its mental health and socioeconomic sequelae. Herein, I report findings from the largest multivariable analysis to date using US nationally-representative data on 153,543 adults including 19,985 adults with long COVID to explore key predictors and sequelae of long COVID. An estimated 14.0% of adults aged 18-84 y (35.11 million adults) and 15.5% of working-aged adults aged 18-64 y (30.65 million adults) had developed long COVID by November 2022. Several sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors predicted long COVID including lower household income, being aged 30-49 y, Hispanic, female, gay/lesbian or bisexual, and divorced/separated. Even after accounting for such factors, having long COVID was linked to higher risks of recent unemployment, financial hardship, and anxiety and depressive symptomatology, with evidence of dose-response relationships. Overall, an estimated 27.7 million US adults aged 18-84 y and 24.2 million working-aged adults with long COVID who had been or may still be at risk of adverse socioeconomic and mental health outcomes. Lost work was further calculated to be the equivalent of 3 million workers annually, and the estimated annual lost earnings due to long COVID among working-aged adults totaled $175 billion. These preliminary findings highlight the substantial public health and economic implications of long COVID among Americans and should prompt further inquiry and intervention.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Contributions of occupation characteristics and educational attainment to racial/ethnic inequities in COVID-19 mortality 94%
- Public Preferences for Social Distancing Behaviors to Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19: A Discrete Choice Experiment 92%
- The Impact of the “Muslim Ban” Executive Order on Healthcare Utilization in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative Social Disadvantage and Health-Related Quality of Life: National Health Interview Survey 2013-2017 94%
- Does pre-infection stress increase the risk of long COVID? Longitudinal associations between adversity worries and experiences in the month prior to COVID-19 infection and the development of long COVID and specific long COVID symptoms 93%
- Structural racism and COVID-19 response: Higher risk of exposure drives disparate COVID-19 deaths among Black and Hispanic/Latinx residents of Illinois, USA 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between prolonged SARS-CoV-2 symptoms and work outcomes 94%
- Reductions in US life expectancy from COVID-19 by Race and Ethnicity: Is 2021 a repetition of 2020? 94%
- Time trends, factors associated with, and reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a massive online survey of US adults: January-May 2021 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Covid-19 by Race and Ethnicity: A National Cohort Study of 6 Million United States Veterans 91%
- Structural factors contributing to SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the urban slum setting 91%
- Covid-19 Testing, Hospital Admission, and Intensive Care Among 2,026,227 United States Veterans Aged 54-75 Years 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.