Back

Subclonal somatic copy number alterations emerge and dominate in recurrent osteosarcoma

Kinnaman, M. D.; Zaccaria, S.; Makohon-Moore, A.; Arnold, B.; Levine, M.; Gundem, G.; Ossa, J. E. A.; Glodzik, D.; Sanchez, M. I. R.; Bouvier, N.; Li, S.; Stockfisch, E.; Dunigan, M.; Cobbs, C.; Bhanot, U.; You, D.; Ortiz, M. V.; O'Donohue, T.; Slotkin, E.; Wexler, L. H.; Cruz, F. S. D.; Hameed, M.; Bender, J. L. G.; Tap, W. D.; Meyers, P.; Papaemmanuil, E.; Kung, A. L.; Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A.

2023-01-06 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.01.05.522765 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiple large-scale tumor genomic profiling efforts have been undertaken in osteosarcoma, however, little is known about the spatial and temporal intratumor heterogeneity and how it may drive treatment resistance. We performed whole-genome sequencing of 37 tumor samples from eight patients with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma. Each patient had at least one sample from a primary site and a metastatic or relapse site. We identified subclonal copy number alterations in all but one patient. We observed that in five patients, a subclonal copy number clone from the primary tumor emerged and dominated at subsequent relapses. MYC gain/amplification was enriched in the treatment-resistant clone in 6 out of 7 patients with more than one clone. Amplifications in other potential driver genes, such as CCNE1, RAD21, VEGFA, and IGF1R, were also observed in the resistant copy number clones. Our study sheds light on intratumor heterogeneity and the potential drivers of treatment resistance in osteosarcoma. SignificanceSubclonal copy number clones emerged and dominated in relapsed osteosarcoma, with MYC gain/amplification being the defining characteristic in our cohort. Selective pressure from neoadjuvant chemotherapy revealed this clone at the time of primary resection, highlighting that genomic profiling at this time may identify clones that are selected for, or determine innate resistance to primary chemotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
6.2%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.1%
5
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.5%
7
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
8
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.6%
16
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.4%
19
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
22
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
23
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%