What is known about the determinants of developing antipsychotic-induced metabolic syndrome and interventions to address them for community dwelling adults: a scoping review protocol
Good, E.; Scott, S.; Bhattacharya, D.
Show abstract
1.0IntroductionAntipsychotics are the primary treatment for severe mental health conditions. Whilst antipsychotics are effective at improving psychiatric outcomes, approximately 80% of people will experience metabolic side effects (MSEs), characterised by weight gain, lipid disturbance and glucose dysregulation. Antipsychotic-induced MSEs are associated with a two-fold increased risk of developing coronary heart disease and a five-fold risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Gender, ethnicity, age, and family history are reported non-modifiable determinants of developing antipsychotic-induced MSEs and indicate who is at highest risk. However, it is not clear which determinants are most significant to inform targeting interventions for high-risk individuals. Antipsychotics induce increases in calorie intake and sedentary behaviours. Behavioural determinants are modifiable and provide potential intervention targets, however, the extent to which they have been studied and targeted is unclear. The literature describes the testing of non-pharmacological interventions to target behaviours. However, few studies report clinically significant attenuation of MSEs, and the preferred healthcare setting to deliver an intervention to prevent antipsychotic-induced MSEs is yet to be established. Methods and analysisThis review will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR checklist (Appendix 1). Relevant electronic databases will be searched. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method study designs, and evidence syntheses will be considered. One reviewer will independently screen titles and abstracts, with a 20% sample checked by two reviewers. Full text screening will be undertaken by one reviewer with a 10% sample checked by another. Data will be extracted and synthesised to address the research objectives. Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publication in a scientific journal. medRxiv registration detailsDOI:10.1101/2023.01.05.22283663 2.0 STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYO_LIThis study will be the first to systematically identify the knowledge gaps the in body of literature relating to the modifiable and non-modifiable determinants of antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects (MSEs) in community dwelling adults, the non-pharmacological interventions to target behaviours that have previously been implemented to prevent and/or treat antipsychotic-induced MSEs and their success or non-success, and the preferred context of delivery of such interventions from the point of view of the individuals affected by antipsychotic-induced MSEs. Insights from these can highlight areas to inform further research in this area. C_LIO_LIThis study will link modifiable determinants of antipsychotic-induced MSEs to the theoretical domains framework (TDF), which can be linked to a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to inform components for a future intervention. C_LIO_LIThe review will take a rigorous approach, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. C_LIO_LIOnly literature published in English will be included. This could potentially limit the diversity of literature captured in the review. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE): protocol for a realist review 97%
- Interventions Promoting Recovery from Depression for Patients Transitioning from Outpatient Mental Health Services to Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review 94%
- Pharmacotherapy, drug-drug interactions and potentially inappropriate medication in depressive disorders 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Global prevalence of antidepressant utilization in the community: A protocol for a systematic review 95%
- Study protocol for the development and internal validation of SPIRIT (Schizophrenia Prediction of Resistance to Treatment): A clinical tool for predicting risk of treatment resistance to anti-psychotics in First Episode Schizophrenia 95%
- Side effect profile and comparative tolerability of newer generation antidepressants in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of mental health illness in Nigeria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Understanding the Challenges of Medicine Optimisation Among Older People From Ethnic Minority Communities (Aged 60 Years and Above) With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Realist Review Protocol 91%
- Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attitude towards Mental Help-Seeking, Motivation, and Economic Resources in Connection with Positive, Negative, and General Psychopathological Symptoms of Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study of a Psychoeducation Program 92%
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 92%
- Psychedelic mushrooms in the USA: Knowledge, patterns of use and association with health outcomes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and Adverse Drug Reactions Among Adults in a London Mental Health Service, 2008-2018 93%
- Relapse prevention through health technology program reduces hospitalization in schizophrenia 92%
- A Systematic Review on Psychological and Biological Mediators Between Adversity and Psychosis: Potential Targets for Treatment 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.