Back

Synthetic STING agonists elicit powerful vaccine adjuvancy providing robust central memory and anti-tumour effects

Towner, L. D.; Dahal, L. N.; Taylor, M. C.; Cox, K. L.; Inzhelevskaya, T.; Mack, M.; Wedge, S. R.; Richardson, C.; Cragg, M. S.; Beers, S. A.

2023-01-04 immunology
10.1101/2023.01.04.522614 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Drugs that target the innate immune sensor STING are known to be effective in modulating the immune infiltrate of the tumour microenvironment. STING agonists have potential to enhance responses to checkpoint inhibitor therapy, however, their ability to influence and shape adaptive immune responses is poorly understood. Here, we investigated the impact of a range of synthetic STING agonists on antigen specific CD8+ T-cell responses to soluble antigen using the murine OT-1 adoptive transfer model with Ovalbumin as the antigen to monitor T cell responses. Our data demonstrate that synthetic STING agonists are able to stimulate antigen specific T-cell expansion in response to challenge in mice. This effect required expression of STING, an intact myeloid compartment and Type-I IFN and TNF signalling. Expanded T-cells post treatment differed from those induced by the established immune adjuvant, anti-CD40 antibody through lower induction of the immune checkpoint receptor PD-1. Furthermore, our data revealed a marked increase in the induction and persistence of CD8+ central memory cells after STING agonist and antigen challenge. Finally, we demonstrate that following rechallenge, STING agonism produced larger secondary responses that could be translated into enhanced tumour protection and survival. Therefore, synthetic STING agonists are capable of acting as potent immune adjuvants and can induce robust memory formation leading to better recall and tumour control. Critically, these benefits along with the lower expression of PD-1, have implications for their use as adjuvants for multiple immunotherapy and vaccine applications.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.0%
2
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.5%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 11%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
6
Science Immunology
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
7
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
11
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
European Journal of Immunology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
17
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
20
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Nature Immunology
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
Mucosal Immunology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%