Back

Deep brain stimulation and dopamine medication enhance free choice preference in Parkinson's disease

Bendetowicz, D.; Temiz, G.; Hainque, E.; Czernecki, V.; Lau, B.; Karachi, C.; Munuera, J.

2023-01-04 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.01.04.522610 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHumans prefer making choices freely, even when they dont maximize future outcomes, suggesting free-choice is intrinsically rewarding. However, whether reward-related brain networks influence choice preference remains unclear. In Parkinsons disease (PD), value-based decision impairments are well-documented, but mechanisms underlying intrinsically motivated behavior are poorly understood. This study investigates how the dopaminergic and basal ganglia systems encode intrinsic reward in PD. MethodsWe designed a decision-making task dissociating free-choices intrinsic value from extrinsic reward. Twenty PD patients with subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) and twentyfive on dopamine (DA) therapy performed the task ON and OFF their treatments. Their performances were compared to twenty age-matched healthy controls. To explore neural mechanisms, we analyzed DBS active contacts, modeled the volume of tissue activated, and examined cortico-subthalamic connectivity using high-resolution diffusion MRI. ResultsPD patients OFF STN-DBS exhibited reduced free-choice preference, which increased when STN-DBS was ON, particularly in risky choices. This effect correlated with the recruitment of the right medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). DA therapy did not modulate free-choice preference acutely, but higher chronic DA levels correlated with increased free-choice preference. ConclusionsOur findings suggest STN-DBS enhances free-choice preference via the right mPFC-STN network, while chronic DA therapy amplifies free-choice sensitivity. This implies that freechoice preference is influenced by mPFC modulation, increasing impulsivity toward risky choices, and dopamines role in enhancing sensitivity to both extrinsic and intrinsic rewards.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.