Modelling the stable subspace of distributed brain responses in stimulus processing
Vidaurre, D.
Show abstract
Each brain response to a stimulus is, to a large extent, unique. However this variability, our perceptual experience feels stable. Standard decoding models, which utilise information across several areas to tap into stimuli representation and processing, are fundamentally based on averages. Therefore, they can focus precisely on the features that are most stable across stimulus presentations. But which are these features exactly is difficult to address in the absence of a generative model of the signal. Here, I introduce genephys, a generative model of brain responses to stimulation publicly available as a Python package that, when confronted with a decoding algorithm, can reproduce the structured patterns of decoding accuracy that we observe in real data. Using this approach, I characterise how these patterns may be brought about by the different aspects of the signal, which in turn may translate into distinct putative neural mechanisms. In particular, the model shows that the features in the data that support successful decoding --and, therefore, likely reflect stable mechanisms of stimulus representation-- have an oscillatory component that spans multiple channels, frequencies and latencies of response; and an additive, slower response with a specific (cross-frequency) relation to the phase of the oscillatory component. At the individual trial level, still, responses are found to be highly variable, which can be due to various factors including phase noise and probabilistic activations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling signal and noise in neural responses through generative modeling 96%
- Adaptive oscillators provide a hard-coded Bayesian mechanism for rhythmic inference 96%
- Time-resolved dynamic computational modeling of human EEG recordings reveals gradients of generative mechanisms for the MMN response 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Different methods to estimate the phase of neural rhythms agree, but only during times of low uncertainty 95%
- A Stochastic Dynamic Operator framework that improves the precision of analysis and prediction relative to the classical spike-triggered average method, extending the toolkit. 95%
- Neurophysiological evidence for cognitive map formation during sequence learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.