Diagnostic testing in people with primary ciliary dyskinesia: an international participatory study
Schreck, L. D.; Pedersen, E. S. L.; Cizeau, I.; Müller, L.; Kruljac, C.; Lucas, J. S.; Goutaki, M.; Kuehni, C. E.
Show abstract
Diagnostic tests are important in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), a rare disease, to confirm the diagnosis and characterize the disease. We compared diagnostic tests for PCD between countries worldwide, assessed whether people with PCD recall their tests, and identified factors associated with the use of tests. We used cross-sectional data from COVID-PCD--an international participatory cohort study collecting information directly from people with PCD. The baseline questionnaire inquired about tests used for PCD diagnosis. Using logistic regression, we investigated factors associated with measurement of nasal nitric oxide (nNO), biopsy for electron or video microscopy, and genetic testing. We included data from 747 participants (60% females) from 49 countries worldwide with median age 27 (interquartile range 12-44). Most (92%) reported diagnostic tests for PCD. Participants reported measurements of nNO (342; 49%), biopsy samples (561; 75%), and genetic tests (435; 58%). The reported use of individual tests, such as genetics, varied between countries from 38% in Switzerland to 68% in North America. Participant recall of test type also differed between countries with lowest recall in Switzerland. One-third (232; 36%) of participants reported all three tests (nNO, biopsy, and genetics). Recently diagnosed people reported more tests [nNO odds ratio (OR) 2.2, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.5-3.2; biopsy OR 3.2, 95%CI 2.1-4.9; genetics OR 4.7, 95%CI 3.2-6.9] and those with situs abnormalities fewer tests (nNO OR 0.5, 95%CI 0.4-0.7; biopsy OR 0.5, 95%CI 0.4-0.8; genetics OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.5-0.94). Our results indicate PCD diagnostic testing differed widely around the world and many patients received incomplete diagnostic work-up based only on clinical features or single tests. People diagnosed long ago and those with situs abnormalities possibly benefit from supplementary testing to refine their diagnosis as a prerequisite for personalized medicine.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Priorities and barriers for research related to primary ciliary dyskinesia 96%
- Association between upper and lower respiratory disease among patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia: an international study 95%
- COVID-PCD – a participatory research study on the impact of COVID-19 in people with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnosis in children with prolonged or recurrent cough: findings from the Swiss Paediatric Airway Cohort 93%
- Agreement of parent- and child-reported wheeze: are they associated with FeNO and lung function? 92%
- Diagnosis in children with exercise-induced respiratory symptoms: a multi-centre study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic value of cutaneous manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection 89%
- Risk mitigating behaviours in people with inflammatory joint and skin disease during the COVID-19 pandemic differ by treatment type: a cross-sectional patient survey 87%
- Transcriptomic Changes During Stage Progression of Mycosis Fungoides 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spirometric classifications of COPD severity as predictive markers for clinical outcomes: the HUNT Study 90%
- Determinants of adolescent lung function in Indians: race, nutrition and systemic inflammation 90%
- A MUC5B gene polymorphism, rs35705950-T, confers protective effects in COVID-19 infection 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causes And MEchanisms foR non-atopic Asthma in Children (CAMERA) Study: rationale and protocol 90%
- Proteomic associations with forced expiratory volume – a Mendelian randomisation study 89%
- The Effect of a Post-Bronchodilator FEV 1 /FVC < 0.7 on COPD Diagnosis and Treatment: A Regression Discontinuity Design 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.