A Phase 2/3 observer-blind, randomized, controlled study to determine the safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine in Indian children and adolescents aged 2 to 17 years
Gunale, B.; Kapse, D.; Kar, S.; Bavdekar, A.; Kohli, S.; Lalwani, S.; Meshram, S.; Raut, A.; Kulkarni, P.; Samuel, C.; Munshi, R.; Gupta, M.; Plested, J. S.; Cloney-Clarke, S.; Zhu, M.; Pryor, M.; Hamilton, S.; Thakar, M.; Shete, A.; Dharmadhikari, A.; Bhamare, C.; Shaligram, U.; Poonawalla, C. S.; Mallory, R. M.; Glenn, G. M.; Kulkarni, P. S.; COVOVAX-Ped Study Group,
Show abstract
BackgroundA recombinant, adjuvanted COVID-19 vaccine, SII-NVX-CoV2373 was manufactured in India and evaluated in Indian children and adolescents to assess safety and immunogenicity. MethodsThis was a Phase 2/3 observer-blind, randomized, controlled immuno-bridging study in children and adolescents aged 2 to 17 years. Participants were randomly assigned in 3:1 ratio to receive two doses of SII-NVX-CoV2373 or placebo on day 1 and day 22. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7 days after each vaccination. Unsolicited AEs were collected for 35 days following first dose and serious AEs (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI) were collected throughout the study. Anti S IgG and neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 were measured at baseline, day 22, day 36 and day 180. Variant immune responses were assessed in a subset of participants at baseline, day 36 and day 180. Primary objectives were to demonstrate non-inferiority of SII-NVX-CoV2373 in each pediatric age group (12 to 17 years and 2 to 11 years, separately) to that in adults in terms of ratio of titers of both anti-S IgG and neutralizing antibodies 14 days after the second dose (day 36). Non-inferiority was to be concluded if the lower bound of 95% CI of the ratio was >0.67. ResultsA total of 920 children and adolescents (460 in each age cohort; 12 to 17 years and 2 to 11 years) were randomized and vaccinated. The demographic and baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable in both age groups. After the second dose, there were more than 100-fold rise in anti-S IgG GMEUs and more than 84-fold rise in neutralizing antibodies GMTs from baseline in the participants who received SII-NVX-CoV2373. The lower bound of 95% CI of GMT ratios for anti-S IgG GMEUs and neutralizing antibodies in both age groups to those observed in Indian adults were >0.67, thus non-inferiority was met [Anti-S IgG GMT ratios 1.52 (1.38, 1.67), 1.20 (1.08, 1.34) and neutralizing antibodies GMT ratios 1.93 (1.70, 2.18), 1.33 (1.17, 1.50) for 2 to 11 years and 12 to 17 years groups, respectively]. The seroconversion rate was [≥] 98% (anti-S IgG) and [≥] 97.9 % (neutralizing antibodies) in both age groups, respectively. Similar findings were seen in the baseline seronegative participants. SII-NVX-CoV2373 also showed robust responses against various variants of concern. Injection site pain, tenderness, swelling, erythema and fever, headache, malaise, fatigue, were the common ([≥]5%) solicited adverse events which were transient and resolved without any sequelae. Throughout the study, only two causally unrelated SAEs and no AESI were reported. ConclusionSII-NVX-CoV2373 has been found safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents of 2 to 17 years. The vaccine was highly immunogenic and the immune response was non-inferior to that in adults. Registration - CTRI No. CTRI/2021/02/031554
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of Biological E’s CORBEVAX™ vaccine in children and adolescents: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo controlled, Phase-2/3 Study 98%
- A randomized clinical trial of a booster dose with low versus standard dose of AZD1222 in adult after 2 doses of inactivated vaccines 97%
- A randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial of two recombinant dimeric RBD COVID-19 vaccine candidates: safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine in adolescents aged 12-17 years in Thai population, prospective cohort study 98%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster of protein subunit vaccine MVC-COV1901 after two doses of adenoviral vector vaccine AZD1222 97%
- Immunogenicity and adverse events of priming with inactivated whole SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) followed by boosting the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 COVID-19 vaccine in adults: data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase 3 trial in Russia 97%
- Immunogenicity and safety of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine compared with Trivalent Influenza HA vaccine and evaluation of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine batch-to-batch consistency in Indonesian children and adults 96%
- Immune response induced by the Recombinant Novel Coronavirus Vaccine (Adenovirus Type 5 Vector) (Ad5-nCoV) in persons living with HIV (PLWH) 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Homologous and heterologous boosting of the ChAdOx1-S1-S COVID-19 vaccine with the SCB-2019 vaccine candidate: a randomized, observer-blinded, controlled, phase 2 study 98%
- Correlation of post-vaccination fever with specific antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 booster and no significant influence of antipyretic medication 96%
- Global Safety Assessment of Adverse Events of Special Interest Following 2 Years of Use and 772 Million Administered Doses of mRNA-1273 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of inactive COVID-19 vaccines against severe illness in B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant-infected patients in Jiangsu, China 94%
- Vaccine effectiveness of primary and booster COVID-19 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Netherlands from 12 July 2021 to 6 June 2022: a prospective cohort study 93%
- Comparison of Antibody Response Durability of mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and Ad26.COV2.S SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Healthcare Workers 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.