Back

Learning Cortical Hierarchies with Temporal Hebbian Updates.

Aceituno, P. V.; Farinha, M. T.; Loidl, R.; Grewe, B. F.

2023-01-02 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.01.02.522459 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A key driver of mammalian intelligence is the ability to represent incoming sensory information across multiple abstraction levels. For example, in the visual ventral stream, incoming signals are first represented as low-level edge filters and then transformed into high-level object representations. These same hierarchical structures routinely emerge in artificial neural networks (ANNs) trained for image/object recognition tasks, suggesting that a similar process might underlie biological neural networks. However, the classical ANN training algorithm, backpropagation, is considered biologically implausible, and thus several alternative biologically plausible methods have been developed. For instance, several cortical-inspired ANNs in which the apical dendrite of a pyramidal neuron encodes top-down prediction signals have been proposed. In this case, akin to theories of predictive coding, a prediction error can be calculated locally inside each neuron for updating its incoming weights. Notwithstanding, from a neuroscience perspective, it is unclear whether neurons could compare their apical vs. somatic spiking activities to compute prediction errors. Here, we propose a solution to this problem by adapting the framework of the apical-somatic prediction error to the temporal domain. In particular, we show that if the apical feedback signal changes the postsynaptic firing rate, we can use differential Hebbian updates, a rate-based version of the classical spiking time-dependent plasticity (STDP) updates. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a cortical-like deep ANN has been trained using such time-based learning rules. Overall, our work removes a key requirement of biologically plausible models for deep learning that does not align with plasticity rules observed in biology and proposes a learning mechanism that would explain how the timing of neuronal activity can allow supervised hierarchical learning.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.2%
3
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
4
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
Biological Cybernetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
14
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
15
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
17
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
22
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%