Back

On the correspondence between the transcriptomic response of a compound and its effects on its targets

Engler Hart, C.; Ence, D.; Healey, D.; Domingo-Fernandez, D.

2023-01-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.01.01.522411 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Better understanding the transcriptomic response produced by a compound perturbing its targets can shed light on the underlying biological processes regulated by the compound. However, establishing the relationship between the induced transcriptomic response and the target of a compound is non-trivial, partly because targets are rarely differentially expressed. Thus, connecting both modalities requires orthogonal information (e.g., pathway or functional information). Here, we present a comprehensive study aimed at exploring this relationship by leveraging thousands of transcriptomic experiments and target data for over 2,000 compounds. Firstly, we confirmed that compound-target information does not correlate as expected with the transcriptomic signatures induced by a compound. However, we demonstrate how the concordance between both modalities can be increased by connecting pathway and target information. Additionally, we investigated whether compounds that target the same proteins induce a similar transcriptomic response and conversely, whether compounds with similar transcriptomic responses share the same target proteins. While our findings suggest that this is generally not the case, we did observe that compounds with similar transcriptomic profiles are more likely to share at least one protein target, as well as common therapeutic applications. Lastly, we present a case scenario on a few compound pairs with high similarity to demonstrate how the relationship between both modalities can be exploited for mechanism of action deconvolution.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.