Back

The illusion of personal health decisions for infectious disease management: disease spread in social contact networks

Michalska-Smith, M.; Enns, E.; White, L. A.; Gilbertson, M. L.; Craft, M. E.

2023-01-03 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.01.01.22284075 medRxiv
Show abstract

Close contacts between individuals provide opportunities for the transmission of diseases, including COVID-19. Individuals take part in many different types of interactions, including those with classmates, co-workers, and household members; the conglomeration of all of these interactions produces a complex social contact network interconnecting individuals across the population. Thus, while an individual might decide their own risk tolerance in response to a threat of infection, the consequences of such decisions are rarely so confined, propagating far beyond any one person. We asses the effect of different population-level risk-tolerance regimes, population structure in the form of age and household-size distributions, and different types of interactions on epidemic spread in plausible human contact networks to gain insight into how contact network structure affects pathogen spread through a population. In particular, we find that changes in behaviour of vulnerable individuals in isolation is insufficient to reduce those individuals infection risk, that population structure can have varied and counter-acting effects on epidemic outcomes, and that, in general, interactions among co-workers have a greater contribution to disease spread than do interactions among children at school. Taken together, these results promote a nuanced understanding of disease spread on contact networks, with implications for public health strategies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
22.0%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.7%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.8%
6
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.7%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
11
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.7%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
14
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%