Back

The bacterial genetic determinants of Escherichia coli capacity to cause bloodstream infections in humans

Burgaya, J.; Marin, J.; Royer, G.; Condamine, B.; Gachet, B.; Clermont, O.; Jaureguy, F.; Burdet, C.; Lefort, A.; de Lastours, V.; Denamur, E.; Galardini, M.; Blanquart, F.; The Colibafi/Septicoli Group, ; The COLIVILLE Group,

2023-01-02 microbiology
10.1101/2022.12.31.522367 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Escherichia coli is both a highly prevalent commensal and a major opportunistic pathogen causing bloodstream infections (BSI). A systematic analysis characterizing the genomic determinants of extra-intestinal pathogenic vs. commensal isolates in human populations, which could inform mechanisms of pathogenesis, diagnostics, prevention and treatment is still lacking. We used a collection of 1282 BSI and commensal E. coli isolates collected in France over a 17-year period (2000-2017) and we compared their pangenomes, genetic backgrounds (phylogroups, STs, O groups), presence of virulence-associated genes (VAGs) and antimicrobial resistance genes, finding significant differences in all comparisons between commensal and BSI isolates. A machine learning linear model trained on all the genetic variants derived from the pangenome and controlling for population structure reveals similar differences in VAGs, discovers new variants associated with pathogenicity (capacity to cause BSI), and accurately classifies BSI vs. commensal strains. Pathogenicity is a highly heritable trait, with up to 69% of the variance explained by bacterial genetic variants. Lastly, complementing our commensal collection with an older collection from 1980, we predict that pathogenicity increased steadily from 23% in 1980 to 46% in 2010. Together our findings imply that E. coli exhibit substantial genetic variation contributing to the transition between commensalism and pathogenicity and that this species evolved towards higher pathogenicity.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.