Back

A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of the Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Naproxen Sodium and Acetaminophen Following Implant Placement Surgery

Theken, K. N.; Chen, M.; Wall, D. L.; Pham, T.; Secreto, S. A.; Yoo, T. H.; Rascon, A. N.; Chang, Y.-C.; Korostoff, J. M.; Mitchell, C. H.; Hersh, E. V.

2022-12-30 dentistry and oral medicine
10.1101/2022.12.30.22284065 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to compare the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of naproxen sodium and acetaminophen after implant placement surgery. Materials and MethodsAdult patients who received one or two dental implants were treated with naproxen sodium (440 mg loading dose + 220 mg q8h, n=15) or acetaminophen (1000 mg q6h - max daily dose 3000 mg, n=15) for three days after implant placement in a randomized, double-blind design. Pain was assessed on a 0-10 scale every 20 minutes for 6 h. Tramadol (50 mg) was available as a rescue medication. Plasma and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were collected prior to the surgery and 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, and 72h after surgery for quantification of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and IL-1{beta} levels. ResultsPain scores were significantly lower in patients treated with naproxen sodium compared to those treated with acetaminophen. Inflammatory mediator levels in plasma and GCF increased after surgery and returned to near baseline levels by 72h. Plasma IL-6 levels were significantly lower 6h after surgery in patients treated with naproxen sodium compared to acetaminophen. No differences in inflammatory mediator concentrations in GCF were observed between the treatment groups. ConclusionsNaproxen sodium was more effective than acetaminophen in reducing post-operative pain and systemic inflammation following surgical placement of one or two dental implants. Further studies are needed to determine whether these findings are applicable to more complex implant cases and how they affect clinical outcomes following implant placement.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Dental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.7%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.6%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.4%
6
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.4%
7
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
10
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
11
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
13
Virulence
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Neurobiology of Pain
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
19
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
25
Pain
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%