Back

An engineered ACE2 decoy broadly neutralizes Omicron subvariants and shows therapeutic effect in SARS-CoV-2-infected cynomolgus macaques

Urano, E.; Itoh, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Sasaki, T.; Kishikawa, J.-i.; Akamatsu, K.; Higuchi, Y.; Sakai, Y.; Okamura, T.; Mitoma, S.; Sugihara, F.; Takada, A.; Kimura, M.; Hirose, M.; Sasaki, T.; Koketsu, R.; Tsuji, S.; Yanagida, S.; Shioda, T.; Hara, E.; Matoba, S.; Matsuura, Y.; Kanda, Y.; Arase, H.; Okada, M.; Takagi, J.; Kato, T.; Hoshino, A.; Yasutomi, Y.; Saito, A.; Okamoto, T.

2023-01-02 microbiology
10.1101/2022.12.29.522275 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Omicron variant continuously evolves under the humoral immune pressure obtained by vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection and the resultant Omicron subvariants exhibit further immune evasion and antibody escape. Engineered ACE2 decoy composed of high-affinity ACE2 and IgG1 Fc domain is an alternative modality to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 and we previously reported its broad spectrum and therapeutic potential in rodent models. Here, we show that engineered ACE2 decoy retains the neutralization activity against Omicron subvariants including the currently emerging XBB and BQ.1 which completely evade antibodies in clinical use. The culture of SARS-CoV-2 under suboptimal concentration of neutralizing drugs generated SARS-CoV-2 mutants escaping wild-type ACE2 decoy and monoclonal antibodies, whereas no escape mutant emerged against engineered ACE2 decoy. As the efficient drug delivery to respiratory tract infection of SARS-CoV-2, inhalation of aerosolized decoy treated mice infected with SARS-CoV-2 at a 20-fold lower dose than the intravenous administration. Finally, engineered ACE2 decoy exhibited the therapeutic efficacy for COVID-19 in cynomolgus macaques. Collectively, these results indicate that engineered ACE2 decoy is the promising therapeutic strategy to overcome immune-evading SARS-CoV-2 variants and that liquid aerosol inhalation can be considered as a non-invasive approach to enhance efficacy in the treatment of COVID-19.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
Cell Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.9%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
6
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
7
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.0%
10
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
11
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
12
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Journal of Molecular Cell Biology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
20
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
22
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
24
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.7%
25
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.6%
28
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%