Back

A broad matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor with designed loop extension exhibits ultrahigh specificity for MMP-14

Bonadio, A.; Wenig, B.; Hockla, A.; Radisky, E. S.; Shifman, J. M.

2022-12-29 biochemistry
10.1101/2022.12.29.522231 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are key drivers of various diseases, including cancer. While several antibodies against MMPs are in development, our goal is to construct therapeutic anti-MMP inhibitors based on a natural broad MMP inhibitor, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (N-TIMP2). To confer high binding specificity toward one MMP type, we extend one of the N-TIMP2 loops, allowing it to interact with the non-conserved MMP surface. Multiple computational designs of the loop were used to design a focused library for yeast surface display, which was sorted for high binding to the target MMP-14 and low binding to off-target MMP-3. Deep sequencing of the two selected populations followed by comparative data analysis was used to identify the most promising variants, which were expressed, purified, and tested for inhibition of MMP-14 and off-target MMPs. Our best N-TIMP2 variant exhibited 29 pM binding affinity to MMP-14 and 2.4 {micro}M affinity to MMP-3, 7500-fold more specific than WT N-TIMP2. Furthermore, the variant inhibited cell invasion with increased potency relative to WT N-TIMP2 in two breast cancer cell lines. We obtained the engineered variant high-accuracy model by including NGS data as input to AlphaFold multiple sequence alignment (MSA). Modeling results together with experimental mutagenesis demonstrate that the loop packs tightly against non-conserved residues on MMP-14 and clashes with MMP-3. This study demonstrates that introduction of loop extensions into inhibitors to stretch to the non-conserved surface of the target proteins is an attractive strategy for conferring high binding specificity in design of MMP inhibitors and other therapeutic proteins.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.