Back

To remain modern, the coexistence program requires modern statistical rigor

Armitage, D. W.

2022-12-30 ecology
10.1101/2022.12.28.522056 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A recent study by Van Dyke et al.1 paired experimental drought manipulations with demographic models and trait measurements to project major shifts in coexistence among a number of annual plant taxa. However, re-analysis of the data under alternative, more predictive competition models reveals that the authors original conclusions are very sensitive to slight variations in model form. Furthermore, propagating model parameter error into coexistence predictions results in relatively weak support for the majority of coexistence shifts predicted by the authors original model. These results highlight the need for increased statistical rigor when treating binary predictions of species coexistence as observed experimental outcomes, as is commonly practiced in empirical coexistence studies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.6%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
6
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
14
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
16
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
20
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
21
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
24
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%