Back

Developmental stage-dependent effects of perceived predation risk on physiology and fledging success of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor)

McNew, S.; Taff, C. C.; Zimmer, C.; Uehling, J.; Ryan, T. A.; von Oordt, D. C.; Houtz, J. L.; Injaian, A. S.; Vitousek, M. N.

2022-12-27 ecology
10.1101/2022.12.27.522041 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The risk of predation directly affects physiology, behavior, and fitness of wild birds. Social interactions with conspecifics may affect how individuals respond to stressors such as predators. Strong social connections could help individuals recover from a stressful experience; however, competitive interactions also have the potential to exacerbate stress. Few studies have investigated the interaction between environmental stressors and the social landscape in wild bird populations. Here, we experimentally simulated predation attempts on breeding female tree swallows (Tachicyneta bicolor). At the same time, we manipulated female breast plumage color, a key social signal. Simulated predation events on tree swallows negatively affected their nestlings condition, telomere lengths, and fledging success. However, the effects of experimental manipulations were timing-dependent: simulated predation during the early nestling period was more detrimental than "predation" during incubation. Contrary to our expectations, manipulation of the social environment did not affect the response of tree swallows to simulated predation. However, manipulating female plumage during the nestling period did affect nestling size, indicating an effect of the social environment on reproductive success. Our data demonstrate that transient stressors on breeding female birds can have carry-over effects on their nestlings, some of which may be long-lasting.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.