Early excitatory and inhibitory modifications in the motor cortex following skill learning support motor memory consolidation and cortical plasticity overnight
Eisenstein, T.; Furman-Haran, E.; Tal, A.
Show abstract
The learning of new motor skills constitutes an inseparable part of our lives. Motor consolidation refers to the offline processing of motor memories following the acquisition of new motor skills. The animal literature suggests that the primary motor cortex (M1) plays a key role in motor memory consolidation, and structural and functional plasticity in M1 following motor consolidation have been demonstrated. However, the mechanisms supporting motor memory consolidation and plasticity in the human M1 are not well understood. Initial human neuroimaging studies show that the initial stages of motor learning in humans are accompanied by short-term temporal dynamics of the brains main excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters - Glutamate (Glu) and GABA - in M1, but it remains unclear how these relate to the question of motor memory consolidation. Here, we show that early Glu and GABA modifications in M1 following motor skill learning may play vital roles in supporting motor memory consolidation and neural plasticity that take place over longer time scales. Using a multimodal magnetic resonance approach implemented on ultra-high field 7T scanner in healthy young adults (n=36), we found increased Glu and decreased GABA in M1 during the initial offline period following learning to support consolidation-related local and inter-regional functions of M1, such as motor memory reactivation and increased functional connectivity with the striatum. These neurochemical changes also correlated with overnight structural and functional plasticity expressed as increased M1 grey matter volume and functional connectivity, while Glu modifications also correlated with adaptive behavior, as reflected by improvements in skill performance. Our results provide intriguing microscale mechanistic evidence to the potential distinctive roles of Glu and GABA in promoting motor memory consolidation and plasticity in the human M1. They also highlight a role for early neurochemical modifications to memory consolidation and plasticity in the human brain and may hold important clinical implications in rehabilitative settings such as in stroke and brain injury.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prefrontal stimulation prior to motor sequence learning alters multivoxel patterns in the striatum and the hippocampus 97%
- The neurocognitive gains of diagnostic reasoning training using simulated interactive veterinary cases. 96%
- Structural and functional features characterizing the brains of individuals with higher controllability of motor imagery 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-brain studies of spontaneous behavior in head-fixed rats enabled by zero echo time MB-SWIFT fMRI 96%
- Characterizing habit learning in the human brain at the individual and group levels: a multi-modal MRI study 96%
- Shared subcortical arousal systems across sensory modalities during transient modulation of attention 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distributed harmonic patterns of structure-function dependence orchestrate human consciousness 96%
- Functionnectome: a framework to analyse the contribution of brain circuits to fMRI 95%
- The interaction between endogenous GABA, functional connectivity and behavioral flexibility is critically altered with advanced age 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Concurrent assessment of neurometabolism and brain hemodynamics to comprehensively characterize the functional brain response to psychotropic drugs: an S-ketamine study 96%
- MRS-measured Glutamate versus GABA reflects excitatory versus inhibitory neural activities in awake mice 94%
- Acute psilocybin and ketanserin effects on cerebral blood flow: 5-HT2AR neuromodulation in healthy humans 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.