Back

Multisite Study of Optical Genome Mapping of Retrospective and Prospective Constitutional Disorder Cohorts

Broeckel, U.; Iqbal, M. A.; Levy, B.; Sahajpal, N.; Nagy, P. L.; Scharer, G.; Bossler, A. D.; Rodriguez, V.; Stence, A.; Skinner, C.; Skinner, S. A.; Kolhe, R.; Stevenson, R.

2022-12-31 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2022.12.26.22283900 medRxiv
Show abstract

Several medical societies including the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, the American Academy of Neurology, and the Association of Molecular Pathology recommend chromosomal microarray (CMA) as the first-tier test in the genetic work-up for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders such as developmental delay and intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, as well as other disorders suspected to be of genetic etiology. Although CMA has significantly increased the diagnostic yield for these disorders, limitations in the technology preclude detection of certain structural variations in the genome and requires reflexing to other cytogenomic and molecular methods. Optical genome mapping (OGM) is a high-resolution technology that utilizes ultra-high molecular weight DNA, fluorescently labeled at a hexamer motif found throughout the genome, to create a barcode pattern, analogous to G-banded karyotyping, that can detect all classes of structural variations at very high resolution by comparison to a reference genome. A multisite study, partially published previously, with a total of n=1037 datapoints was conducted and showed 99.6% concordance between OGM and standard-of-care (SOC) testing for completed cases. The current phase of this study included cases from individuals with suspected genetic conditions referred for cytogenomic testing in a prospective postnatal cohort (79 cases with OGM and SOC results) and a retrospective postnatal cohort (262; same criteria). Among these cohorts were an autism spectrum disorder cohort (135) group with negative or uninformative results on previous testing (72). Prospective cases referred for CMA were included in this study as an unbiased comparison, OGM results show 100% concordance with variants of uncertain significance, pathogenic variants, and likely pathogenic variants reported by CMA other SOC and found reportable variants in an additional 10.1% of cases. Among the autism spectrum disorder cohort, OGM found reportable variants in an additional 14.8% of cases. Based on this demonstration of the analytic validity and clinical utility of OGM by this multi-site assessment, and considering clinical diagnostics often require iterative testing for detection and diagnosis in postnatal constitutional disorders, OGM should be considered as a first-tier test for neurodevelopmental disorders and/or suspicion of a genetic disease.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.7%
3
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.2%
4
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.3%
5
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
7
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
11
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.3%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
18
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
20
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%