Back

Generation of anti-tumor chimeric antigen receptors incorporating T cell signaling motifs

Balagopalan, L.; Moreno, T.; Qin, H.; Yi, J.; McIntire, K. M. M.; Alvinez, N.; Pallikkuth, S.; Lee, M. E.; Yamane, H.; Tran, A. D.; Youkharibache, P.; Cachau, R. E.; Taylor, N.; Samelson, L. E.

2022-12-26 immunology
10.1101/2022.12.25.521452 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) T cells have been successfully used to treat lymphoma, leukemia, and multiple myeloma, but adverse effects due to cytokine secretion, CAR-T cell exhaustion, and loss of target antigen have limited their potential. Furthermore, while CARs have been designed to harness T Cell Receptor (TCR) signaling, they are significantly less sensitive than TCRs, resulting in suboptimal signaling. We have developed novel Chimeric Adapter Proteins (CAPs) that are designed to trigger signaling downstream of the TCR{zeta} chain. CAPs are chimeric molecules that contain adapter domains in tandem with the kinase domain of ZAP70, fused to an extracellular targeting domain. We hypothesized that CAPs would be more potent than CARs because kinetic proofreading steps that define the signaling threshold and the inhibitory regulation of upstream molecules are bypassed. Indeed, second generation CAPs exhibited high anti-tumor efficacy, and significantly enhanced long-term in vivo tumor clearance in leukemia-bearing NSG mice as compared with conventional CD19-28{zeta} CAR-T. Mechanistically, CAPs were activated in an Lck-independent manner and displayed slower phosphorylation kinetics and a longer duration of signaling compared with 28{zeta}-CAR. The unique signaling properties of CAPs may therefore be harnessed to improve the in vivo efficacy of T cells engineered to express an anti-tumor chimeric receptor.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.