Back

Spatial modeling of telomere intra-nuclear distribution reveals non-random organization that varies during cell cycle and depends on LAP2 and BAF

Keller, D.; Stinus, S.; Umlauf, D.; Gourbeyre, E.; Biot, E.; Olivier, N.; Mahou, P.; Beaurepaire, E.; Andrey, P.; Crabbe, L.

2022-12-22 cell biology
10.1101/2022.12.22.521599 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genome organization within the 3D nuclear volume influences major biological processes but is completely lost during mitosis, which represents a major challenge to maintain cellular identity and cell fate. To restore a functional G1 nucleus for the next cell cycle, it is imperative to reestablish genome organization during post-mitotic nuclear assembly. Importantly, the configuration of linear chromosomes has been shown to directly impact spatial genome architecture. Both centromeres and telomeres are known to associate with nuclear structures, such as the nuclear envelope, and support chromatin distribution. Here, using high-resolution 3D imaging combined with 3D spatial statistics and modeling, we showed that telomeres generally followed a regular distribution compared to what is expected under a random organization. While the preferential localization of telomeres at nuclear periphery was restricted to early G1, we found a strong clustering of centromeres in addition to their predominant peripheral localization at all cell cycle stages. We then conducted a targeted screen using MadID to identify the molecular pathways driving or maintaining telomere anchoring to the nuclear envelope. Among these factors, we could show that LAP2 transiently localizes to telomeres in anaphase, at a stage where LAP2 initiates the reformation of the nuclear envelope. Moreover, co-depletion of LAP proteins and their partner BAF impacted telomere redistribution in the next interphase. There results suggest that in addition to their crucial role in genome protection, telomeres also participate in reshaping functional G1 nuclei after mitosis.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.