Back

Unbiased single cell spatial analysis localises inflammatory clusters of immature neutrophils-CD8 T cells to alveolar progenitor cells in fatal COVID-19 lungs

Weeratunga, P.; Denney, L.; Bull, J. A.; Repapi, E.; Sergeant, M.; Etherington, R.; Vuppusetty, C.; Turner, G. D. H.; Clelland, C.; Cross, A.; Issa, F.; de Andrea, C. E.; Bermejo, I. M.; Sims, D.; McGowan, S.; Zurke, Y.-X.; Ahern, D. J.; Gamez, E. C.; Whalley, J.; Richards, D.; Klenerman, P.; Monaco, C.; Udalova, I. A.; Dong, T.; Ogg, G.; Knight, J.; Byrne, H. M.; Taylor, S.; Ho, L.-P.

2022-12-23 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2022.12.21.22283654 medRxiv
Show abstract

Single cell spatial interrogation of the immune-structural interactions in COVID -19 lungs is challenging, mainly because of the marked cellular infiltrate and architecturally distorted microstructure. To address this, we developed a suite of mathematical tools to search for statistically significant co-locations amongst immune and structural cells identified using 37-plex imaging mass cytometry. This unbiased method revealed a cellular map interleaved with an inflammatory network of immature neutrophils, cytotoxic CD8 T cells, megakaryocytes and monocytes co-located with regenerating alveolar progenitors and endothelium. Of note, a highly active cluster of immature neutrophils and cytotoxic CD8 T cells, was found spatially linked with alveolar progenitor cells, and temporally with the diffuse alveolar damage stage. These findings provide new insights into how immune cells interact in the lungs of severe COVID-19 disease. We provide our pipeline [Spatial Omics Oxford Pipeline (SpOOx)] and visual-analytical tool, Multi-Dimensional Viewer (MDV) software, as a resource for spatial analysis. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=190 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/22283654v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (58K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f1332forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1576abcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@208c84org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e93975_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.4%
3
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.0%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
8
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
10
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
14
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
20
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
23
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.7%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
27
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%