Dissecting Complexity: The Hidden Impact of Application Parameters on Bioinformatics Research
Cashman, M.; Cohen, M. B.; Marsh, A. L.; Cottingham, R. W.
Show abstract
Biology is a quest; an ongoing inquiry about the nature of life. How do the different forms of life interact? What makes up an ecosystem? How does a tiny bacterium work? To answer these questions biologists turn increasingly to sophisticated computational tools. Many of these tools are highly configurable, allowing customization in support of a wide range of uses. For example, algorithms can be tuned for precision, efficiency, type of inquiry, or for specific categories of organisms or their component subsystems. Ideally, configurability provides useful flexibility. However, the complex landscape of configurability may be fraught with pitfalls. This paper examines that landscape in bioinformatics tools. We propose a methodology, SOMATA, to facilitate systematic exploration of the vast choice of application parameters, and apply it to three different tools on a range of scientific inquires. We further argue that the tools themselves are complex ecosystems. If biologists explore these, ask questions, and experiment just as they do with their biological counterparts, they will benefit by both finding improved solutions to their problems as well as increasing repeatability and transparency. We end with a call to the community for an increase in shared responsibility and communication between tool developers and the biologists that use them in the context of complex system decomposition.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging large language models for data analysis automation 96%
- Countering reproducibility issues in mathematical models with software engineering techniques: A case study using a one-dimensional mathematical model of the atrioventricular node 96%
- Academic Tracker: Software for Tracking and Reporting Publications Associated with Authors and Grants 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.