Back

Abundant pleiotropy across neuroimaging modalities identified through a multivariate genome-wide association study

Tissink, E.; Shadrin, A. A.; van der Meer, D.; Parker, N.; Hindley, G.; Roelfs, D.; Frei, O.; Fan, C. C.; Nagel, M.; Naerland, T.; Budisteanu, M.; Djurovic, S.; Westlye, L. T.; van den Heuvel, M.; Posthuma, D.; Kaufmann, T.; Dale, A. M.; Andreassen, O.

2022-12-20 genetics
10.1101/2022.12.20.521181 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genetic pleiotropy is abundant across spatially distributed brain characteristics derived from one neuroimaging modality (e.g. structural, functional or diffusion MRI). A better understanding of pleiotropy across modalities could inform us on the integration of brain function, micro- and macrostructure. Here we show extensive genetic overlap across neuroimaging modalities at a locus and gene level in the UK Biobank (N=34,029) and ABCD Study (N=8,607). When jointly analysing phenotypes derived from structural, functional and diffusion MRI with the Multivariate Omnibus Statistical Test (MOSTest), we boost the discovery of loci and genes beyond previously identified effects for each modality individually. Cross-modality genes are involved in fundamental biological processes and predominantly expressed during prenatal brain development. We additionally boost prediction of psychiatric disorders by conditioning independent GWAS on our multimodal multivariate GWAS. These findings shed light on the shared genetic mechanisms underlying variation in brain morphology, functional connectivity, and tissue composition. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=192 SRC="FIGDIR/small/521181v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (65K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e7eadcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ec127eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b21f14org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1690c5_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.