CMA-ES-Rosetta: Blackbox optimization algorithm traverses rugged peptide docking energy landscapes
Claussen, E. R.; Renfrew, P. D.; Müller, C. L.; Drew, K.
Show abstract
Energy minimization is necessary for virtually all modeling and design tasks and involves traversing extremely rugged energy landscapes. Although the gradient descent based minimization routines in Rosetta have fast runtimes, due to these rugged landscapes, minimization often converges into high-energy local minima. Alternative numerical optimization techniques, such as evolution strategies, are more robust to rugged landscapes and have been shown to be highly successful on a diverse set of problems. Here we explore the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES), a state-of-the-art derivative-free optimization algorithm, as a complementary approach to the default minimizer in Rosetta. We used a benchmark of 26 peptides, from the FlexPepDock Benchmark, to assess the performance of three algorithms in Rosetta, specifically, CMA-ES, Rosettas default minimizer, and a Monte Carlo protocol of small backbone perturbations. We test the algorithms performance on their ability to dock an idealized peptide to a series of hotspots residues (i.e. constraints) along a native peptide. Of the three methods, CMA-ES was able to find the lowest energy conformation for 23 out of 26 benchmark peptides. The application of CMA-ES allows for an alternative optimization method for macromolecular modeling problems with rough energy landscapes.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cycledesigner Leveraging RFdiffusion and HighFold to Design Cyclic Peptide Binders for Specific Targets 97%
- PymolFold: A PyMOL Plugin for API-driven Structure Prediction and Quality Assessment 95%
- RosENet: Improving binding affinity prediction by leveraging molecular mechanics energies with a 3D Convolutional Neural Network 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.