Is there an accurate and generalisable way to use soundscapes to monitor biodiversity?

Acoustic monitoring has the potential to deliver biodiversity insight on vast scales. Whilst autonomous recording networks are being deployed across the world, existing analytical techniques struggle with generalisability. This limits the insight that can be derived from audio recordings in regions without ground-truth calibration data. By calculating 128 learned features and 60 soundscape indices of audio recorded during 8,023 avifaunal point counts from diverse ecosystems, we investigated the generalisability of soundscape approaches to biodiversity monitoring. Within each dataset, we found univariate correlations between several acoustic features and avian species richness, but features behaved unpredictably across datasets. Training a machine learning model on compound indices, we could predict species richness within datasets. However, models were uninformative when applied to datasets not used for training. We found that changes in soundscape features were correlated with changes in avian communities across all datasets. However, there were cases where avian communities changed without an associated shift in soundscapes. Our results suggest that there are no common hallmarks of biodiverse soundscapes across ecosystems. Therefore, soundscape monitoring should only be used when high quality ground-truth data exists for the region of interest, and in conjunction with more targeted and accurate in-person ecological surveys. By better understanding how to use interpret data reliably, we hope to unlock the scale at which acoustic monitoring can be used to deliver true impact for land managers and scientists monitoring biodiversity around the world. SummaryWhilst eco-acoustic monitoring has the potential to deliver biodiversity insight on vast scales, existing analytical approaches behave unpredictably across studies. We collated 8,023 audio recordings with paired manual avifaunal point counts to investigate whether soundscapes could be used to monitor biodiversity across diverse ecosystems. We found that neither univariate indices nor machine learning models were predictive of species richness across datasets, but soundscape change was consistently indicative of community change. Our findings indicate that there are no common features of biodiverse soundscapes, and that soundscape monitoring should be used cautiously and in conjunction with more reliable in-person ecological surveys.