Back

HBM-CITEseq: a uniform CITE-seq processing pipeline for the HuBMAP Consortium

Lu, X.; Ruffalo, M.

2022-12-20 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.12.19.521058 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As part of the HuBMAP Consortium we have been developing methods for uniformly processing and indexing multiple single-cell datasets, which enable efficient integration of data from different platforms. HuBMAP computational pipelines have so far focused on unimodal data types such as single-cell/nucleus RNA sequencing and single nucleus ATAC-seq. Here we present HBM-CITEseq, a processing pipeline for Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing (CITE-seq) datasets, the first multimodal sequencing processing pipeline for the HuBMAP Consortium, with transcriptomic outputs from HBM-CITEseq matching those of the HuBMAP RNA-seq pipeline. HBM-CITEseq is a CWL workflow wrapping command-line tools encapsulated in Docker images. It is freely available on GitHub at https://github.com/hubmapconsortium/citeseq-pipeline.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.6%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.7%
Similar papers in this journal
4
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
9.8%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.2%
7
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.4%
8
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
10
Gigabyte
● 62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
11
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.7%
12
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
14
Patterns
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
BMC Biology
○ 265 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
188 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Journal of Computational Biology
○ 48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
Methods
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Journal of Molecular Biology
○ 232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.0%
22
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.8%
24
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
● 37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.