Back

Deep learning-based predictive identification of functional subpopulations of hematopoietic stem cells and multipotent progenitors

Wang, S.; Han, J.; Huang, J.; Shi, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Kim, D.; Islam, M. K.; Zhou, J.; Ostrovsky, O.; Lian, Z.; Liu, Y.; Huang, J.

2022-12-20 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.12.19.519644 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and multipotent progenitors (MPPs) are crucial for maintaining lifelong hematopoiesis. Developing methods to distinguish stem cells from other progenitors and evaluate stem cell functions has been a central task in stem cell research. Deep learning has been demonstrated as a powerful tool in cell image analysis and classification. In this study, we explored the possibility of using deep learning to differentiate HSCs and MPPs based on their light microscopy (DIC) images. After extensive training and validation with large image data sets, we successfully develop a three-class classifier (we named it the LSM model) that reliably differentiate long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs), short-term HSCs (ST-HSCs), and MPPs. Importantly, we demonstrated that our LSM model achieved its differentiating capability by learning the intrinsic morphological features from cell images. Furthermore, we showed that the performance of our LSM model was not affected by how these cells were identified and isolated, i.e., sorted by surface markers or intracellular GFP markers. Prospective identification of HSCs and MPPs in Evi1GFP transgenic mice by LSM model suggested that the cells with the highest GFP expression were LT-HSCs, and this prediction was substantiated later by a long-term competitive reconstitution assay. Moreover, based on DIC image data sets, we also successfully built another two-class classifier that can effectively distinguish aged HSCs from young HSCs, which both express the same surface markers but are functionally different. This finding is of particular interest since it may provide a novel quick and efficient approach, obviating the need for a time-consuming transplantation experiment, to evaluate the functional states of HSCs. Together, our study provides evidence for the first time that HSCs and MPPs can be differentiated by deep learning based on cell morphology. This novel and robust deep learning-based platform will provide a basis for the future development of a new generation stem cell identification and separation system. It may also provide new insight into molecular mechanisms underlying the self-renewal feature of stem cells.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 10%
9.8%
2
Experimental Hematology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.3%
4
Cytotherapy
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
6
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.9%
8
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
12
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
18
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Stem Cells
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Cytometry Part A
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
25
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
27
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
28
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
29
Cell Research
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%