The convergence and divergence of spontaneous brain activity of humans and marmosets
Zhang, J.
Show abstract
The brain at rest or during periods of relative inactivity, complex dynamical patterns of activity spontaneously form over the entire brain. In this study, we plan to clarify the convergence and divergence of spontaneous brain activity across humans and marmosets. We investigated the spontaneous brain dynamics of marmosets, and compared its convergence and divergence with human neuroimaging results. We identified seven representative FC patterns (FC states) in the resting-state activity of marmosets. The most prevalent two FC patterns (VC1 and VC2) corresponds to a state of BOLD coherence of primary visual and auditory processing regions. Our results suggested that the spontaneous activity does reflect the inherent properties of the brain of marmosets.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ultra-high field (10.5 T) resting state fMRI in the macaque 96%
- Metastability, fractal scaling, and synergistic information processing: what phase relationships reveal about intrinsic brain activity 96%
- Asymmetric directed functional connectivity within the frontoparietal motor network during motor imagery and execution 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial ultrasound stimulation effect in the redundant and synergistic networks consistent across macaques 96%
- Test-Retest Reliability of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Parameters for a Two-State Model 96%
- Predicting MEG resting-state functional connectivity using microstructural information 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The Time Varying Networks of the Interoceptive Attention and Rest 96%
- Development of the Functional Connectome Topology in Adolescence: evidence from Topological Data Analysis 96%
- Resting state networks of awake adolescent and adult squirrel monkeys using ultra-high field (9.4T) functional magnetic resonance imaging 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.