coronabambini.ch: Development and usage of an online decision support tool for pediatric COVID-testing in Switzerland: a cross-sectional analysis
Starvaggi, C.; Travaglini, N.; Aebi, C.; Romano, F.; Steiner, I.; Sauter, T. C.; Keitel, K.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo describe the development and usage of coronabambini.ch as an example of a pediatric electronic public health application and to explore its potential and limitations in providing information on disease epidemiology and public health policy implementation. DesignWe developed and maintained a non-commercial online decision support tool, coronabambini.ch, to translate the Swiss FOPH pediatric (age 0-18 years) COVID-19 guidelines around testing and school/daycare attendance for caregivers, teachers, and healthcare personnel. We analyzed the online decision tool as well as a voluntary follow-up survey from October 2020 to September 2021 to explore its potential as a surveillance tool for public health policy and epidemiology. Participants68269 users accessed and 52726 filled out the complete online decision tool. 3% (1399/52726) filled out a voluntary follow-up. 92% (18797/20330) of users were parents. ResultsCertain dynamics of the pandemic and changes in testing strategies were reflected in the data captured by coronabambini.ch: e.g. in terms of disease epidemiology, gastrointestinal symptoms were reported more frequently in younger age-groups (13% (3308/26180) in children 0-5 years versus 9% (3934/42089) in children [≥]6 years, [X]2=184, P=<.001). As a reflection of public health policy, the proportion of users consulting the tool for a positive contact without symptoms in children 6-12 years increased from 4% (1415/32215) to 6% (636/9872) after the FOPH loosened testing criteria in this age-group, [X]2=69, P=<.001. Adherence to the recommendation was generally high (84% (1131/1352)) but differed by the type of recommendation: 89% (344/385) for "stay at home and observe", 75% (232/310) for "school attendance". ConclusionsUsage of coronabambini.ch was generally high in areas where it was developed and promoted. Certain patterns in epidemiology and adherence to public health policy could be depicted but selection bias was difficult to measure showing the potential and challenges of digital decision support as public health tools. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIWe developed and maintained a non-commercial online decision support tool, coronabambini.ch, based on the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) pediatric COVID-19 guidelines around testing and school/daycare attendance. C_LIO_LIWe performed a descriptive analysis of the usage data from the tool between October 2020 to September 2021 to explore its potential as a surveillance tool for public health policy and epidemiology. C_LIO_LIA follow-up survey measured comprehensibility and adherence of the online decision tool. C_LIO_LIThe types of selection biases of the data were difficult to assess within this voluntary online survey system. C_LIO_LIResponse rate of the follow-up survey was low and participants with high education and high health literacy were overrepresented. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility of an online antigen self-testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 addressed to health care and education professionals in Catalonia (Spain). The TESTA’T-COVID Project 95%
- Identifying clinical skill gaps of healthcare workers using a digital clinical decision support algorithm during outpatient pediatric consultations in primary health centers in Rwanda 94%
- Towards a COVID-19 symptom triad: The importance of symptom constellations in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting public take-up of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 crisis: Results of a national survey 93%
- Has the pandemic enhanced and sustained digital health-seeking behaviour? A big data interrupted time-series analysis of Google Trends 92%
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Specchio-COVID19 cohort study: a longitudinal follow-up of SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey participants in the canton of Geneva, Switzerland (Study protocol) 93%
- Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the United Kingdom, Italy and Slovenia 92%
- Cohort Study Protocol of the Brazilian Collaborative Research Network on COVID-19: strengthening WHO global data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ePOCT+ and the medAL-suite: Development of an electronic clinical decision support algorithm and digital platform for pediatric outpatients in low- and middle-income countries 94%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 93%
- Impact of a pilot mHealth intervention on treatment outcomes of TB patients seeking care in the private sector using Propensity Scores Matching – Evidence collated from New Delhi, India 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.