Effect of image registration on the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI of patients with esophageal cancer
Lee, J.; Ma, J.; Carter, B.; Court, L.; Lin, S.
Show abstract
We investigated the effectiveness of the most commonly used registration methods (deformable and rigid-body registrations) with different reference images on pharmacokinetic parameters estimated from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of esophageal cancer patients. We obtained DCE-MRI images from 10 patients with esophageal cancer. Both rigid-body and deformable registrations of the images were performed on DCE-MRI images at different time points as reference images before the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. The deformable registration used non-rigid B-spline transforms in a multi-resolution scheme, and Euler transform were used for the rigid body registration. A nonparametric statistical test and the intra-class correlation coefficient assessed the consistency and reproducibility of the pharmacokinetic parameters estimated with both registration methods and using images acquired at different time points. Kruskal-Wallis testing demonstrated significant differences (p < 0.05) in all the estimated parameters for deformable registration but no significant differences (p > 0.78) for rigid-body registration. The intra-class correlation coefficient for rigid-body registration was higher than that for deformable registration for each pharmacokinetic parameter, indicating that, for rigid-body registration, the parameter values from different reference images of one patient tended to be similar to each other. In contrast, the values for deformable registration were more variable. In conclusion, the choice of the reference image of deformable registration significantly affected the estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters, and rigid-body registration showed small variations in pharmacokinetic parameters over the choice of the reference images for small motion artifacts of small distal esophageal cancer on DCE-MRI.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Correction of Artifacts Induced by B0 Inhomogeneities in Breast MRI using Reduced Field-of-View Echo-Planar Imaging and Enhanced Reverse Polarity Gradient Method 94%
- Improved characterization of diffusion in normal and cancerous prostate tissue through optimization of the restriction spectrum imaging signal model 93%
- Pancreas MRI segmentation into head, body, and tail enables regional quantitative analysis of heterogeneous disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Graph-based Spatial Features with Overall Survival Status of Glioblastoma Patients 94%
- Developing a Fully Automated Imaging Biomarker for HCC Risk Assessment via MRI-Based Tumor Segmentation and EPM 93%
- Segmentation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding vessels in CT images using deep convolutional neural networks and Texture Descriptors 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Phantom System Designed to Assess the Effects of Membrane Lipids on Water Proton Relaxation 94%
- Age and gender dependence of liver diffusion parameters and the evidence of intravoxel incoherent motion modelling of perfusion component is constrained by diffusion component. 93%
- Non-invasive Real-time Detection of Potassium level Changes in Skeletal Muscles during Exercise by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Image Downsampling Expedited Adaptive Least-squares (IDEAL) fitting improves intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) analysis in the human kidney 95%
- Investigation of diffusion time dependence of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters in the human kidney 94%
- Real-time Imaging of Decompression Gas Bubble Growth in the Spinal Cord of Live Rats 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.