Back

sgRNA structural constraints and genetic limitations for efficient Cas9 genome editing to generate knock-outs

Haussmann, I. U.; Dix, T. C.; Dezi, V.; Hans, A. I.; Arnold, R.; Soller, M.

2022-12-15 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.12.15.520550 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A single guide RNA (sgRNA) directs Cas9 nuclease for gene-specific scission of double-stranded DNA. High Cas9 activity is essential for efficient gene editing to generate gene deletions and gene replacements by homologous recombination. However, cleavage efficiency is below 50% for more than half of randomly selected sgRNA sequences in human cell culture screens or model organisms. We used in vitro assays to determine intrinsic molecular parameters for maximal sgRNA activity including correct folding of sgRNAs and Cas9 structural information. From comparison of over 10 data sets, we find major constraints in sgRNA design originating from defective secondary structure of the sgRNA, sequence context of the seed region, GC context and detrimental motifs, but we also find considerable variation among different prediction tools when applied to different data sets. To aid selection of efficient sgRNAs, we developed web-based PlatinumCRISPr, an sgRNA design tool to evaluate base-pairing and sequence composition parameters for optimal design of highly efficient sgRNAs for Cas9 genome editing named PlatinumCRISPr. We applied this tool to select sgRNAs to efficiently generate gene deletions in Drosophila Ythdc1 and Ythdf, that bind to N6 methylated adenosines (m6A) in mRNA. However, we discovered, that generating small deletions with sgRNAs and Cas9 leads to ectopic reinsertion of the deleted DNA fragment elsewhere in the genome. These insertions can be removed by standard genetic recombination and chromosome exchange. These new insights into sgRNA design and the mechanisms of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing advances efficient use of this technique for safer applications in humans.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.