ASXL1 mutations that cause Bohring Opitz Syndrome (BOS) or acute myeloid leukemia share epigenomic and transcriptomic signatures
Lin, I.; Awamleh, Z.; Wei, A.; Russell, B.; Weksberg, R. A.; Arboleda, V. A.
Show abstract
De novo, truncating variants of ASXL1 cause two distinct disorders: Bohring-Opitz Syndrome (BOS, OMIM #605039) a rare pediatric disorder characterized by multiorgan anomalies that disrupt normal brain, heart, and bone development causing severe intellectual disability or are somatic driver mutations causing acute myeloid leukemia(AML). Despite their distinct clinical presentations, we propose that ASXL1 mutations drive common epigenetic and transcriptomic dysregulation in BOS and AML. We analyzed DNA methylation (DNAm) and RNA-seq data from BOS patients (n=13) and controls (n=38) and publicly available DNAm of AML cases with (n=3) and without (n=3) ASXL1 mutations from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and RNA-seq data from AML cases (n=27) from the Beat AML cohort. Using a DNA-methylation based episignature that we previously developed for BOS, we clustered AML, BOS and normal controls together. We showed that AML samples with ASXL1 mutations clustered closest to individuals with BOS, whereas individuals with AML without ASXL1 mutations clustered separately. We also observe common dysregulation of the transcriptome between BOS and AML with ASXL1 mutations compared to controls. Our transcriptomic analysis identified 821 significantly differentially expressed genes that were shared between both data sets and 74.9% showed differential expression in the same direction. BOS patients are rare and have some reports of tumors but no clear guidelines on cancer screening protocols. This represents the first direct comparison between distinct diseases that show common epigenetic and transcriptomic effects, and potentially common drug targets for patients harboring ASXL1 mutations on the epigenome and transcriptome. KEY POINTSO_LIAcute myeloid leukemias harboring somatic ASXL1 driver mutations and Bohring-Opitz syndrome caused by germline ASXL1 mutations share common epigenomic and transcriptomic dysregulation C_LIO_LIA gene-centric approach can inform molecular mechanisms across distinct disease types and point towards shared targetable pathways. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping AML heterogeneity – multi-cohort transcriptomic analysis identifies novel clusters and divergent ex-vivo drug responses 97%
- AML/T cell interactomics uncover correlates of patient outcomes and the key role of ICAM1 in T cell killing of AML 96%
- Resistance to decitabine and 5-azacytidine emerges from adaptive responses of the pyrimidine metabolism network 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancer heterogeneity in acute lymphoblastic leukemia drives differential gene expression between patients 95%
- Leukemia escapes immunity by imposing a Type-1 regulatory program on neoantigen-specific CD4+ T cells. 94%
- BRG1/BRM inhibitor targets AML stem cells and exerts superior preclinical efficacy combined with BET or Menin inhibitor 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- First-born twin has a higher risk of acute leukemia in a population-based assessment of cancer in twins in California, and lower than anticipated rate of twin concordance 95%
- Genome-wide CRISPR Screens Identify Ferroptosis as a Novel Therapeutic Vulnerability in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 95%
- Quantification of measurable residual disease using duplex sequencing in adults with acute myeloid leukemia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ex Vivo Drug Responses and Molecular Profiles of 597 Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients 95%
- Distinct Stem Cell Identities Converge into Shared Erythroid Stress in ERCC6L2 Disease and Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome 95%
- Bone marrow lymphocyte dynamics during chemotherapy in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.