Processing and evaluating the quality of genome-wide nascent transcription profiling libraries
Scott, T. G.; Martins, A. L.; Guertin, M. J.
Show abstract
Precision genomic run-on assays (PRO-seq) quantify nascent RNA at single nucleotide resolution with strand specificity. Here we deconstruct a recently published genomic nascent RNA processing pipeline (PEPPRO) into its components and link the analyses to the underlying molecular biology. PRO-seq experiments are evolving and variations can be found throughout the literature. The analyses are presented as individual code chunks with comprehensive details so that users can modify the framework to accommodate different protocols. We present the framework to quantify the following quality control metrics: library complexity, nascent RNA purity, nuclear run-on efficiency, alignment rate, sequencing depth, and RNA degradation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- REVERSE: A user-friendly web server for analyzing next-generation sequencing data from in vitro selection/evolution experiments 96%
- PCLIPtools: A Robust Framework for Identifying RNA-Protein Interaction Sites from PAR-CLIP experiments. 95%
- Dysgu: efficient structural variant calling using short or long reads 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- SPEAQeasy: a Scalable Pipeline for Expression Analysis and Quantification for R/Bioconductor-powered RNA-seq analyses 96%
- how are we stranded here: Quick determination of RNA-Seq strandedness 96%
- PIPETS: A statistically informed, gene-annotation agnostic analysis method to study bacterial termination using 3'-end sequencing. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthesis of modified nucleotide polymers by the poly(U) polymerase Cid1: Application to direct RNA sequencing on nanopores. 94%
- NMDtxDB: Data-driven identification and annotation of human NMD target transcripts 94%
- Improved precision, sensitivity, and adaptability of Ordered Two-Template Relay cDNA library preparation for RNA sequencing 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.