Back

Niche overlap between two large herbivores across landscape variability using dietary eDNA metabarcoding

Mas-Carrio, E.; Churski, M.; Kuijper, D.; Fumagalli, L.

2022-12-14 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.12.14.520440 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the relationship between a species feeding strategy and its environment (trophic ecology) is critical to assess environmental requirements and improve management policies. However, measuring trophic interactions remains challenging. Among the available methods, quantifying the plant composition of a species diet indicates how species use their environment and their associated niche overlap. Nevertheless, most studies focusing on herbivore trophic ecology ignore the influence that landscape variability may have. Here, we explored how landscape variability influences diet composition through niche overlap. We used eDNA metabarcoding to quantify the diet composition of two large herbivores of the Bialowieza Forest, Red deer (Cervus elaphus) and European bison (Bison bonasus) to investigate how increasing habitat quality (i.e. higher abundance of deciduous forage species) and predation risk (i.e. density of wolf in the area) influence their diet composition and niche partitioning. Our findings indicate diet composition is non-homogeneous across the landscape, both within and between species. Red deer showed greater diet variability and lower niche overlap within species compared to bison. We detected a reduction of niche overlap for red deer with increasing predation risk, leading to more dissimilar diets, suggesting their feeding behaviour is affected by wolf presence. This correlation was not found for bison, which are rarely predated by wolf. Higher habitat quality was associated with higher niche overlap only within bison, probably due to their suboptimal feeding strategy as browsers. These results show the importance of integrating environment-induced diet variation in studies aimed at determining the landscape usage or niche overlap of a species. Niche overlap can therefore be a powerful tool for inferring predation risk for red deer, and estimating predator abundance or its perception. This approach has enormous potential for wildlife management in areas where predator estimates are unknown or difficult to quantify.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
2
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.7%
3
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
5
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
10
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
13
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
14
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
15
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
18
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
22
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
23
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
24
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.5%
28
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%