Effects of DNA extraction, DNA integrity, and laboratory on the precision of qPCR-based telomere length measurement - a multi-lab impartial study
Lin, J.; Verhulst, S.; Fernandez Alonso, C.; Dagnall, C.; Gadalla, S.; Hastings, W.; Lai, T.-P.; Zheng, Y.-L.; Wang, Y.; Shalev, I.; Epel, E.; Drury, S.
Show abstract
Measuring telomere length (TL) with high precision is challenging. Currently there is insufficient understanding of the causes of variation in measurement precision, particularly for qPCR-based measurement. To better understand how DNA extraction protocols and laboratory-specific analytical factors influence qPCR-based TL measurement precision, we conducted a multi-laboratory study involving four labs and six DNA extraction protocols assaying the same blinded human whole blood samples. DNA extraction protocols differed in underlying principles (magnetic beads, salting out, silica membrane) and commercial kits. A fifth lab performed Telomere Restriction Fragment (TRF) analysis using Southern Blot technique with one DNA extraction protocol. All labs performed TL measurement using their standard procedures on two sets of fifty double blinded samples. Data was sent to a central point for unblinding and statistical analyses. Precision was quantified using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Correlations with TRF measurements were also calculated. Repeated qPCR-based measurements of the same DNA extraction yielded ICC values ranging from 0.24 to 0.94. ICC values calculated over measurements of repeated DNA extractions were on average 0.23 lower and ranged from 0.02 to 0.83. The latter ICC estimates more strongly predicted the association between qPCR- and Southern blot-based measurements across the protocol / lab combinations (R2=0.56 vs. R2=0.93). We conclude that ICC calculated over measurements on repeated DNA extractions reliably indicates measurement precision, while ICC calculated over multiple measurements of the same DNA extraction overestimates measurement precision. Variation in ICC was driven by variation between laboratories, with few consistent DNA extraction protocol effects. Values of DNA integrity and purity generally characterized as reflecting high sample quality, (e.g. OD 260/280 of 1.8 and OD 260/230 of 2.0) were associated with qPCR-based measurement precision, but did not always predict higher ICCs.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-tissue comparison of telomere length and quality metrics of DNA among individuals aged 8 to 70 years 94%
- Performance of the TaqMan™ COVID-19 Pooling Kit for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic populations at an Institution of Higher Education 93%
- Recommendations for sample pooling on the Cepheid GeneXpert(R) system using the Cepheid Xpert(R) Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Limitations of qPCR to estimate DNA quantity: AnRFU method to facilitate inter-laboratory comparisonsfor activity level, and general applicability 94%
- RFU derived LRs for activity level assignments usingBayesian Networks 94%
- Levenshtein Distance as a Measure of Accuracy and Precision in Forensic PCR-MPS Methods 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the false positive rate of highly automated SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing 92%
- Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection 92%
- Diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis using sequence-specific purification of urine cell-free DNA 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A modified dual preparatory method for improved isolation of nucleic acids from laser microdissected fresh-frozen human cancer tissue specimens 91%
- KCL TEST: an open-source inspired asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 surveillance programme in an academic institution 91%
- HAT-field: a very cheap, robust and quantitative point-of-care serological test for Covid-19 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Absolute quantification of rare gene targets in limited samples using crude lysate and ddPCR 94%
- Recombinase Polymerase Amplification of Forensic Short Tandem Repeat Loci 93%
- Validating quantitative PCR assays for cell-free DNA detection without DNA extraction: Exercise induced kinetics in systemic lupus erythematosus patients 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.