Back

Chaotic signatures in host-microbe interactions

Sella, Y.; Broderick, N. A.; Stouffer, K.; McEwan, D. L.; Ausubel, F. M.; Casadevall, A.; Bergman, A.

2022-12-14 microbiology
10.1101/2022.12.14.520402 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Host-microbe interactions constitute dynamical systems that can be represented by mathematical formulations that determine their dynamic nature, and are categorized as deterministic, stochastic, or chaotic. Knowing the type of dynamical interaction is essential for understanding the system under study. Very little experimental work has been done to determine the dynamical characteristics of host-microbe interactions and its study poses significant challenges. The most straightforward experimental outcome involves an observation of time to death upon infection. However, in measuring this outcome, the internal parameters, and the dynamics of each particular host-microbe interaction in a population of interactions are hidden from the experimentalist. To investigate whether a time-to-death (time to event) dataset provides adequate information for searching for chaotic signatures, we first determined our ability to detect chaos in simulated data sets of time-to-event measurements and successfully distinguished the time-to-event distribution of a chaotic process from a comparable stochastic one. To do so, we introduced an inversion measure to test for a chaotic signature in time-to-event distributions. Next, we searched for chaos, in time-to-death of Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Pseudomonas entomophila, respectively. We found suggestions of chaotic signatures in both systems, but caution that our results are preliminary and highlight the need for more fine-grained and larger data sets in determining dynamical characteristics. If validated, chaos in host-microbe interactions would have important implications for the occurrence and outcome of infectious diseases, the reproducibility of experiments in the field of microbial pathogenesis and the prediction of microbial threats. ImportanceIs microbial pathogenesis a predictable scientific field? At a time when we are dealing with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) there is intense interest in knowing about the epidemic potential of other microbial threats and new emerging infectious diseases. To know whether microbial pathogenesis will ever be a predictable scientific field requires knowing whether a host-microbe interaction follows deterministic, stochastic, or chaotic dynamics. If randomness and chaos are absent from virulence, there is the hope for prediction in the future regarding the outcome of microbe-host interactions. Chaotic systems are inherently unpredictable although it is possible to generate shortterm probabilistic models, as is done in applications of stochastic processes and machine learning to weather forecasting. Information on the dynamics of a system is also essential for understanding the reproducibility of experiments, a topic of great concern in biological sciences. Our study finds preliminary evidence for chaotic dynamics in infectious diseases.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
19.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
5
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
6
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
8
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.7%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
15
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
19
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
20
Journal of the Royal Society Interface
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
21
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
24
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
26
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
28
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
29
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%