Back

A novel mechanistic framework for precise sequence replacement using reverse transcriptase and diverse CRISPR-Cas systems

Kim, Y. B.; Pierce, E. B.; Brown, M.; Peterson, B. A.; Sanford, D.; Fear, J.; Nicholl, D.; San Pedro, E.; Reynolds, G. M.; Hunt, J. E.; Schwark, D. G.; Jali, S.; Graham, N.; Cesarz, Z.; Chapman, T. A. L.; Watts, J. M.; Hummel, A. W.

2022-12-13 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.12.13.520319 bioRxiv
Show abstract

CRISPR/Cas systems coupled with reverse transcriptase (RT), such as the recently described Prime editing, allow for site-specific replacement of DNA sequences. Despite widespread testing of Prime editing, it is currently only compatible with type II CRISPR/Cas proteins such as Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Enabling RT compatibility with other CRISPR/Cas domains, such as type V enzymes with orthogonal protospacer adjacent motif specificities and smaller protein size would expand the range of edits that can be made in therapeutic and industrial applications. We achieve this with a novel mode of DNA editing at CRISPR-targeted sites that reverse transcribes the edit into the target strand DNA (e.g., the complement of the PAM-containing strand), rather than the non-target strand DNA, as in Prime editing. We term this technology RNA encoded DNA replacement of alleles with CRISPR (hereafter, REDRAW). We show that REDRAW extends the utility of RT-mediated editing beyond type II to include multiple type V CRISPR domains. REDRAW features a broad (8-10 bases) targeting window, at which all types of substitutions, insertions and deletions are possible. REDRAW combines the advantages of type V CRISPR domains with the extensive range of genetic variation enabled by RT-mediated, templated sequence replacement strategies.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.