Regions with intermediate DNA methylation are epigenomic hotspots governing behavioral adaptation to changing environments
Brindley, E.; Taki, F.; Odell, S. C.; Baker, M. R.; Gal Toth, J.; Toth, M.
Show abstract
Epigenetic and associated gene expression changes in the brain drive animals ability to adapt to changing environments. However, epigenetic attributes of environmental adaptation are unknown. Here we show that exercise, unpredictable stress, and environmental enrichment, conditions that elicit adaptive changes in synaptic plasticity and spatial learning, result in CpG methylation changes in regions that exist in both methylated and unmethylated states (i.e., epigenetically bistable) in hippocampal granule cells. Sustained exposures altered both the epiallelic proportions at these regions and neuronal and behavioral adaptation, indicating their adaptive nature. These malleable regions were enriched in exons and enhancer-associated chromatin marks. Their locations were mostly unique to specific environments but converged on similar synaptic genes. Lastly, manipulating DNA methylation altered epiallelic proportions at bistable regions in granule cells and phenocopied adaptive behavior. We propose that shifts in epiallelic proportions at evolutionarily conserved bistable regions, via gene expression changes, contribute to hippocampal plasticity and behavioral adaptation to changing environments.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-CG methylation and multiple epigenetic layers associate child abuse with immune and small GTPase dysregulation 97%
- Adult neurogenesis improves spatial information encoding in the mouse hippocampus 96%
- Defective folate metabolism causes germline epigenetic instability and distinguishes Hira as a phenotype inheritance biomarker 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.