Back

Antibiotic Treatment Duration for Bacterial Infections - A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

Mo, Y.; Tan, W. C.; Cooper, B. S.

2022-12-12 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.12.11.22283311 medRxiv
Show abstract

Reducing antibiotic treatment duration is a key stewardship intervention to mitigate antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We performed a systematic review of antibiotic duration randomised controlled trials for treatment or prevention of bacterial infections in humans, appraised their methodologies and identified gaps in evidence. All randomised trials indexed in MEDLINE and EMBASE up to October 2022 which compared different treatment durations were included. We found 296 trials, of which 85% showed equivalence or non-inferiority. The majority (73%) considered treatment for respiratory tract infections, genitourinary infections, and post-surgical prophylaxis. Few trials studied severe infections, such as bloodstream infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Trial designs shifted from superiority (74%, 178/242 before 2016) to non-inferiority (74%, 40/54 after 2016). 94% of the trials that defined a per- protocol population reported non-adherence, which may increase the probability of concluding non-inferiority. Only 9 trials collected data to demonstrate the effect of antibiotic duration on AMR colonisation. RegistrationPROSPERO 2021 CRD42021276209 FundingNational Research Foundation Singapore Central Gap Fund; National Medical Research Council, Singapore; Medical Research Council, UK

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.