Back

A survey of proteomic variation across two ethnic groups in Nigeria and its relationship to obesity risk

Biddanda, A.; Perez de Arce, K.; Eze-Echesi, G.; Nwuba, C.; Ibrahim, Y.; Oyedele, O.; Joshi, E.; Alalade, B.; Ajayi, O.; Nwatu, C.; Yakubu, A.; Ene-Obong, A.; Popoola, J.; O'Dushlaine, C.; Fekkes, P.

2022-12-12 genomics
10.1101/2022.12.09.519773 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Proteomic variation between individuals has immense potential for identifying novel drug targets and disease mechanisms. However, with high-throughput proteomic technologies still in their infancy, they have largely been applied in large majority European ancestry cohorts (e.g. the UK Biobank). An open question is the degree to which proteomic signatures seen in European and other groups mirror those seen in diverse populations, such as cohorts from Africa. Coupled with genetic information, we can also gain a better understanding of the role of genetic variants in the regulation of the proteome and subsequent disease mechanisms. To address the gap in our understanding of proteomic variation in individuals of African ancestry, we collected proteomic data from 176 individuals across two ethnic groups (Igbo and Yoruba) in Nigeria. These individuals were also stratified into high BMI (BMI > 30 kg/m2) and normal BMI (20 kg/m2 < BMI < 30 kg/m2) categories. We characterized differences in plasma protein abundance using the Olink Explore 1536 panel between high and normal BMI individuals, finding strong associations consistent with previously known signals in individuals of European descent. We additionally found 73 sentinel cis-pQTL in this dataset, with 21 lead cis-pQTL not observed in catalogs of variation from European-ancestry individuals. In summary, our study highlights the value of leveraging proteomic data in cohorts of diverse ancestry for investigating trait-specific mechanisms and discovering novel genetic regulators of the plasma proteome.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.