Back

Targeted and untargeted nanopore sequencing approaches to profile the gut microbiota of mice infants exposed to ethanol in utero

Pedroso-Roussado, C.; Guppy, F.; Brissett, N.; Bowler, L.; Inacio, J.

2022-12-09 microbiology
10.1101/2022.12.09.519725 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The gut microbiome plays a vital role in host homeostasis and understanding of its biology is essential for a better comprehension of the etiology of disorders such as foetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Here we assessed the effectiveness of targeted and untargeted (metagenomic) nanopore sequencing approaches to profile the gut microbiota of infant mice exposed to ethanol in utero. DNA extracts from the gut content of 12 infant mice exposed to ethanol in utero were analysed using one untargeted and two targeted (full-length 16S rRNA gene and the 16S-ITS-23S region of the ribosomal RNA operon) nanopore sequencing approaches. The targeting of the full-length 16S rRNA gene provided the most comprehensive analysis of the mouse gut microbiota. The differences in diversity between approaches were accounted by the sequencing target (p-value < 0.001). Faecalibaculum rodentium and Duncaniella sp. were the two most prevalent taxa detected using targeted sequencing approaches, while bacterial taxa were more evenly represented when using the metagenomic approach. Full-length 16S rRNA gene nanopore sequencing provides the most discriminatory microbiota compositional analysis of mice faecal samples. However, using nanopore sequencing approaches targeting the metagenome or different taxonomically-informative DNA region appears to introduce significant target-related biases. ImportanceCurrent nanopore approaches have not been standardized which may confound the biological interpretations of hight-throughput sequencing datasets. Additionally, nanopore sequencing still present a high error-rate compared to other more mature sequencing technologies, such as Illumina sequencing. These technological handicaps create the need to study and optimize nanopore sequencing approaches to answer biological questions, such as interrogations of the microbial composition and abundance of clinical and environmental samples. In this work, three nanopore sequencing approaches were designed and attempted to optimize fungal and bacterial profiling sequencing methodologies. Two targeted methods based on the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, and 16S-ITS-23S rrn operon region, and one untargeted shotgun/metagenomic approach were tested. Despite potential experimental and/or bioinformatical biases were found, the 16S rRNA gene-targeted nanopore sequencing was the most comprehensive approach to study the microbial composition of the infant mice gut microbiotas.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
4
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
6
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
9
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
10
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
17
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
24
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
MicrobiologyOpen
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
26
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
27
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
29
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%