RecA balances genomic stability and evolution using many successive mismatch tolerant homology tests
PRENTISS, M.; Wang, D.; Fu, J.; Prevost, C.; Godoy, V.; Kleckner, N. E.; Danilowicz, C.
Show abstract
A double-strand break (DSB) must usually be repaired with as little alteration to the genome as possible, though some rare alterations provide valuable genomic evolution. In E.coli, a DSB undergoes resection to give 3 ssDNA tails. These invading strand tails are loaded with RecA protein and then rapidly search the genome for the corresponding (allelic) partner. Thus, a searching ssDNA/RecA filament must almost never make stable non-allelic contact; therefore, it has been puzzling that RecA forms stable products that join partially homologous sequences. Homology testing by RecA family proteins begins with an 8-bp test, followed by successive homology tests of base pair triplets. Here we introduce a highly simplified homology recognition model to highlight how mismatch sensitivity could affect non-allelic pairing in bacterial genomes. The model predicts that even if each triplet test accepts 2 mismatches, RecA can have [~] 95% probability of establishing allelic pairing after a DSB in E. coli; however, that accuracy requires homology testing {gap}50 contiguous base pairs, consistent with the homology lengths probed in vivo. In contrast, if no mismatches are accepted testing 14 bp is sufficient, and testing more base pairs does not reduce non-allelic pairing because bacterial genomes contain long repeats.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural basis for topological regulation of Tn3 resolvase 94%
- Distinct RPA functions promote eukaryotic DNAreplication initiation and elongation 94%
- Cruciform-forming AT/TA repeats are acted upon by structure selective endonucleases and Rad51 prior to repositioning to the nuclear periphery for repair 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.