Back

Compositional coding of individual finger movements in human posterior parietal cortex and motor cortex enables ten-finger decoding

Guan, C.; Aflalo, T.; Kadlec, K.; Gamez de Leon, J.; Rosario, E. R.; Bari, A.; Pouratian, N.; Andersen, R. A.

2022-12-09 neurology
10.1101/2022.12.07.22283227 medRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSObjectiveC_ST_ABSEnable neural control of individual prosthetic fingers for participants with upper-limb paralysis. ApproachTwo tetraplegic participants were each implanted with a 96-channel array in the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC). One of the participants was additionally implanted with a 96-channel array near the hand knob of the left motor cortex (MC). Across tens of sessions, we recorded neural activity while the participants attempted to move individual fingers of the right hand. Offline, we classified finger movements from neural firing rates using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) with cross-validation. The participants then used the neural classifier online to control individual fingers of a brain-machine interface (BMI). Finally, we characterized the neural representational geometry during individual finger movements of both hands. Main ResultsThe two participants achieved 86% and 92% online accuracy during BMI control of the contralateral fingers (chance = 17%). Offline, a linear decoder achieved ten-finger decoding accuracies of 70% and 66% using respective PPC recordings and 75% using MC recordings (chance = 10%). A compositional code linked corresponding finger movements of the contralateral and ipsilateral hands. SignificanceThis is the first study to decode both contralateral and ipsilateral finger movements from PPC. Online BMI control of contralateral fingers exceeded that of previous finger BMIs. PPC and MC signals can be used to control individual prosthetic fingers, which may contribute to a hand restoration strategy for people with tetraplegia.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.