Back

Causal Inference of CNS-regulated Hormones in COVID-19: A Bidirectional Two-sample Mendelian Randomization Study

Sun, Y.; Ding, Z.; Guo, Y.; Yuan, J.; Zhu, C.; Pan, Y.; Sun, R.

2022-12-07 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.12.07.22283193 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesWe assessed the causal association of three COVID-19 phenotypes with insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), estrogen, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). MethodsWe used a bidirectional two-sample univariate and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the direction, specificity, and causality of the association between CNS-regulated hormones and COVID-19 phenotypes. Genetic instruments for CNS-regulated hormones were selected from the largest publicly available genome-wide association studies in the European population. Summary-level data on COVID-19 severity, hospitalization, and susceptibility were obtained from the COVID-19 host genetic initiative. ResultsDHEA was associated with increased risks of very severe respiratory syndrome (OR=4.21, 95% CI: 1.41-12.59), consistent with the results in multivariate MR (OR=3.72, 95% CI: 1.20-11.51), and hospitalization (OR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.13-4.72) in univariate MR. LH was associated with very severe respiratory syndrome (OR=0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.96) in univariate MR. Estrogen was negatively associated with very severe respiratory syndrome (OR=0.09, 95% CI: 0.02-0.51), hospitalization (OR=0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.78), and susceptibility (OR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.89) in multivariate MR. ConclusionsWe found strong evidence for the causal relationship of DHEA, LH, and estrogen with COVID-19 phenotypes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.