Back

Heating tolerance of ectotherms is explained by temperature's non-linear influence on biological rates

Kong, J. D.; Arnoldi, J.-F.; Jackson, A. L.; Bates, A. E.; Morley, S. A.; Smith, J. A.; Payne, N. L.

2022-12-09 ecology
10.1101/2022.12.06.519315 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The capacity of ectotherms to adjust their thermal tolerance limits through evolution or acclimation seems relatively modest and highly variable, and we lack satisfying explanations for both findings given a limited understanding of what ultimately determines an organisms thermal tolerance. Here, we test if the amount of heating an ectotherm tolerates throughout a heating event until organismal failure scales with temperatures non-linear influence on biological rates. To account for the non-linear influence of temperature on biological rates on heating tolerance, we rescaled the duration of heating events of 316 ectothermic taxa acclimated to different temperatures and describe the biological rate-corrected heating duration. This rescaling reveals that the capacity of an organism to resist a heating event is in fact remarkably constant across any acclimation temperature, enabling high-precision estimates of how organismal thermal tolerance limits vary under different thermal regimes. We also find that faster heating consistently reduces biological rate-corrected heating durations, which helps further explain why thermal tolerance limits seem so variable on absolute temperature scales. Existing paradigms are that heating tolerances and thermal tolerance limits reflect incomplete metabolic compensatory responses, are constrained by evolutionary conservatism, or index failure of systems such as membrane function; our data provide a different perspective and show that an organisms thermal tolerance emerges from the interaction between the non-linear thermal dependence of biological rates and heating durations, which is an approximately-fixed property of a species.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
3
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 14%
7.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.3%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.3%
7
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.3%
8
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
9
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
10
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.6%
12
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.6%
14
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
19
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%