Back

The first homosporous lycophyte genome revealed the association between the dynamic accumulation of LTR-RTs and genome size variation

Yu, J.; Tang, J.; WEI, R.; Lan, M.; Xiang, R.; Xiang, Q.-P.; Zhang, X.-C.

2022-12-08 genomics
10.1101/2022.12.06.519249 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lycophytes and euphyllophytes (ferns and seed plants) are the two surviving lineages of vascular plants. The modern lycophytes (clubmosses) are herbaceous found either heterosporous (Isoetales and Selaginellales) or homosporous (Lycopodiales). The contrasting genome size between homosporous and heterosporous plants has long been an attractive topic. Most clubmosses are the resource plants of Huperzine A (HupA) which is invaluable for treating Alzheimers disease, but the evolutionary trajectory of which in land plants is unexplored. To better understand these fundamental questions, the genome data of a homosporous lycophyte is urgently required. We generated the Lycopodium clavatum L. genome by applying a reformed pipeline for filtering out non-plant sequences. The obtained genome size is 2.30 Gb, distinguished in more than 85% repetitive elements of which 62% is LTR. Two whole genome duplications (WGDs) are rigorously detected. The content of LTR-RTs was more than ten times higher in homosporous lycophytes than heterosporous ones, although most appeared within one Mya. Then, we find that the LTR-RTs birth-death mode (a much greater birth and extremely slower death) contributes the accumulation of LTR-RTs resulting homosporous lycophyte genome expansion, while in heterosporous lycophytes, the mode is exactly the opposite. Furthermore, the five necessary enzymes of the HupA biosynthetic pathway were identified in the L. clavatum genome, but absent in the other land plants. This decoded genome data will be a key cornerstone to elucidating the fundamental aspects of lycophyte biology and land plant evolution.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
5
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
6
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
7
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
8
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
9
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
13
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
17
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
19
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
22
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%