Back

Fractions strategy differences in those born extremely preterm

Carr, S.; Babinchak, W. M.; Istrate, A.; Martyn-Dow, B.; Wang, G.; Chen, W.; Fondran, J.; Zhang, J.; Wein, M.; Yoon, S. Y.; Birnbaum, A.; Roth, E.; Gross, C.; Minich, N.; Thompson, L.; Kim, W. H.; Stern, Y.; Nosarti, C.; Taylor, H. G.; Tatsuoka, C.

2022-12-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.12.06.519175 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionTo investigate the effects of different strategies and cognitive load we explored brain hemodynamic responses associated with the use of different strategies to solve subtraction of fractions. We focused on those born extremely preterm (EPT; <28 weeks gestation) as they are known to have cognitive challenges and struggle with mathematics. We also included a group of full-term (FT) peers for comparison. MethodsFunctional MRI was acquired while the participants mentally solved fraction equations using either a strategy based on improper or mixed fractions. Different fraction item types were given, which affected respective required cognitive loads per strategy. Diffusion and T1-weighted structural images were also acquired. ResultsThe EPT and FT groups differed in terms of task-related hemodynamic responses. Functional group differences were greatest when strategies were applied to item types that result in high cognitive load. Other findings showed reduced white and grey matter volume and reduced white matter connectivity in widespread areas in the EPT group compared to the FT group. ConclusionThe understanding of function and structure presented here may help inform pedagogical practices by allowing for tailoring of mathematical education through identifying suitable strategy adoption that depends on item type, to circumvent weaknesses in cognitive skills.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.