Validation of a decision-analytic model for the cost-effectiveness analysis of a risk-stratified National Breast Screening Programme in the United Kingdom
Wright, S. J.; Gray, E.; Rogers, G.; Donten, A.; Payne, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundThis study follows structured frameworks to assess the internal and external validity of a decision-analytic model-based cost-effectiveness of approaches to implement a risk-stratified national breast screening programme (risk-NBSP) in the United Kingdom (UK). MethodsA pre-defined set of steps were used to conduct the process of validation of a published decision-analytic model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of a risk-NBSP (UK healthcare perspective; lifetime horizon; costs ({pound}; 2019). Internal validation was assessed in terms of: descriptive validity; technical validity; face validity. External validation was assessed in terms of: operational validation; convergent validity (or corroboration); predictive validity. ResultsThe results outline the findings of each step of internal and external validation. The positive aspects of the model in meeting internal validation requirements are shown. The limitations of MANC-RISK-SCREEN are described. ConclusionFollowing a transparent and structured validation process, MANC-RISK-SCREEN has been shown to have good internal validity and satisfactory external validity. We suggest that MANC-RISK-SCREEN provides a robust decision-analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of risk-NBSP from the UK perspective. Key points for decision makersThere are emerging suggested adaptations to national screening programmes, such as the introduction of risk-stratification to the national breast screening programme (risk-NBSP) in the United Kingdom (UK) There is a key role for the use of decision-analytic model-based analysis of healthcare interventions, such as a risk-NBSP, that are difficult to evaluate in trials due to the large number of participants required and very long follow up period required. This study follows structured frameworks to assess the internal and external validity of a decision-analytic model-based cost-effectiveness of a potential risk-NBSP. The decision-analytic model is shown to perform to a satisfactory level, with possible limitations described clearly, to inform resource allocation decisions from the perspective of the UK healthcare system.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- BREAst screening Tailored for HEr (BREATHE) - A Study Protocol On Personalised Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening Programme 94%
- Influence of follow-up, screening age, interval, and compliance on overdiagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a modelling study 92%
- Understanding motivations of older women to continue or discontinue breast cancer screening 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of multivariable machine learning algorithms to predict risk of cancer in symptomatic patients referred urgently from primary care 93%
- An economic evaluation of two self-sampling strategies for HPV primary cervical cancer screening compared with clinician-collected sampling 92%
- Determining the feasibility of calculating pancreatic cancer risk scores for people with new-onset diabetes in primary care (DEFEND PRIME): study protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of whole area testing of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in Merthyr Tydfil, 2020: A Modelling and economic analysis 92%
- Barriers to help-seeking for Malaysian women with symptoms of breast cancer: a mixed-methods, two-step cluster analysis 92%
- ‘Leading from the front’ implementation strategies increase the success of influenza vaccination drives among healthcare workers: A reanalysis of Systematic Review evidence using Intervention Component Analysis (ICA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-Driven Early Detection of Severe Influenza in Jiangsu, China: A Deep Learning Model Validated Through The Design of Multi-Center Clinical Trials and Prospective Real-World Deployment 89%
- Impact of the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic on coverage of RMNH interventions in Ethiopia 88%
- Impact of relaxing Covid-19 social distancing measures on rural North Wales: a simulation analysis 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of COVID-19 disruption to cervical cancer screening in England on excess diagnoses 93%
- CA125 and age-based models for ovarian cancer detection in primary care: a population-based external validation study 92%
- Cost-effectiveness of CA125- and age-informed risk-based triage for ovarian cancer detection in primary care 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.