Nationwide assessment of leadership development for graduate students in the agricultural plant sciences
Da Silva, K. F.; Burnham, E.; Louis, J.; Golick, D.; Everhart, S. E.
Show abstract
Leadership development is a universally important goal across the agricultural plant science disciplines. Although previous studies have identified a need for leadership skills, less is known about leadership skill development in graduate programs. To address this, we constructed a mixed-method study to identify the most significant graduate school leadership experiences of scientists in the agricultural plant science disciplines. The survey was deployed to 6,728 people in the U.S. and received 1,086 responses (16.1% response rate). The majority of respondents reported that they were from one of the major agricultural states and employed at one of the agricultural plant science related doctoral universities, industries, or government. Results from this survey suggest that recent graduates were more engaged in graduate school activities that offered leadership development. Key experiences in graduate school were also identified that may be used to develop future leaders. Additionally, respondents reported the greatest barrier to providing leadership development for graduate students was that it is not part of their program curriculum, however current graduate students responded differently, and identifying lack of funding to support experiences as the greatest barrier. This survey also identified the top ranked professional skills considered most important for effective leaders in agricultural plant sciences as well as respondent-driven recommendations on how graduate programs can improve leadership development. Collectively, these results can be used in the future to identify priorities for skill development and opportunities for graduate student training in leadership skills within the plant science disciplines.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 96%
- High School Science Fair: What Students Say -- Mastery, Performance, and Self-Determination Theory 96%
- Citizenship status and career self-efficacy: An intersectional study of biomedical trainees in the United States 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Education influences knowledge about environmental issues in Washington, DC, USA 93%
- Analysis of the risk and protective roles of work-related and individual variables in burnout syndrome in nurses 92%
- The effects of biodegradable mulch film on the growth, yield, and water use efficiency of cotton and maize in an arid region 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-learning on COVID-19 among medical students and their preparedness to participate in government's COVID-19 response in Bhutan: a cross-sectional study 93%
- On-Farm Genetic Diversity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum spp.) In Digalu Tijo District, Arsi Zone, Ethiopia 93%
- Cloud-controlled microscopy enables remote project-based biology education in Latinx communities in the United States and Latin America 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 94%
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 94%
- Conspiracy beliefs are associated with lower knowledge and higher anxiety levels regarding COVID-19 among students at the University of Jordan 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Open-loop lab-on-a-chip technology enables remote computer science training in Latinx life sciences students 92%
- Yet another lockdown? A large-scale study on people’s unwillingness to be confined during the first 5 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain 91%
- Application of Pedimap -- a pedigree visualization tool -- to facilitate the decisioning of rice breeding in Sri Lanka 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.